Suppr超能文献

非骨水泥型与骨水泥型全膝关节置换术后失血情况的比较:一项系统评价

Comparison of postoperative blood loss in cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

作者信息

Kim Yong Deok, Cho Nicole, Sohn Sueen, Park Seokjae, You Hwang Yong, Koh In Jun

机构信息

Joint Replacement Center, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 12;145(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05687-7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With the advancement of porous surface processing technology, cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has once again garnered attention. Cementless TKA lacks cement sealing, raising concerns regarding potential blood loss. Recently, patient blood management (PBM) protocols have been introduced to mitigate postoperative blood loss and transfusions. In this systematic review, we aimed to address whether cementless TKA leads to increased blood loss and transfusion rates as compared with cemented TKA. Additionally, we explored the impact of contemporary PBM protocols on post-TKA hemodynamics.

METHODS

This systematic review included prospective randomized trials and retrospective studies that compared blood loss and PBM between cementless and cemented TKA. A comprehensive literature search for publications from 1980 onwards was conducted using databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Furthermore, we conducted a thorough examination of the bibliographies of all relevant articles that were retrieved. Studies that met our inclusion criteria were assessed carefully for pertinent data. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Re-views and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and was registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42024507236).

RESULTS

A total of twelve studies were included in this study. Among these, six papers reported lower blood loss in cemented TKA, while the other six papers found no significant difference in perioperative blood loss between the two groups. From the perspective of PBM, seven studies applied PBM protocols including systematic and topical tranexamic acid, autogenous transfusion, strict transfusion threshold and drain clamping, while the remaining five studies did not. If PBM protocols were implemented, no significant difference in blood loss was observed based on the implant fixation method.

CONCLUSION

In the context of recent studies implementing PBM protocols, the choice of implant fixation method appears to have no relevant impact on post-TKA blood loss. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the reporting of outcomes and PBM protocols exhibit considerable variation and heterogeneity.

摘要

引言

随着多孔表面处理技术的进步,非骨水泥全膝关节置换术(TKA)再次受到关注。非骨水泥TKA缺乏骨水泥密封,引发了对潜在失血的担忧。最近,患者血液管理(PBM)方案已被引入以减轻术后失血和输血。在这项系统评价中,我们旨在探讨与骨水泥TKA相比,非骨水泥TKA是否会导致失血增加和输血率升高。此外,我们还探讨了当代PBM方案对TKA术后血流动力学的影响。

方法

本系统评价纳入了比较非骨水泥和骨水泥TKA之间失血情况和PBM的前瞻性随机试验和回顾性研究。使用PubMed、MEDLINE和EMBASE等数据库对1980年以来的出版物进行了全面的文献检索。此外,我们对所有检索到的相关文章的参考文献进行了彻底检查。对符合纳入标准的研究仔细评估相关数据。本系统评价遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,并在PROSPERO注册库(CRD42024507236)中注册。

结果

本研究共纳入12项研究。其中,6篇论文报告骨水泥TKA的失血量较低,而其他6篇论文发现两组围手术期失血量无显著差异。从PBM的角度来看,7项研究应用了PBM方案,包括系统性和局部应用氨甲环酸、自体输血、严格的输血阈值和引流管夹闭,而其余5项研究未应用。如果实施PBM方案,基于植入物固定方法,失血量未观察到显著差异。

结论

在最近实施PBM方案的研究背景下,植入物固定方法的选择似乎对TKA术后失血没有相关影响。然而,需要注意的是,结果报告和PBM方案存在相当大的差异和异质性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验