Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
J Immunol. 2013 May 1;190(9):4763-72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202407. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
Endotoxin tolerance is a complex phenomenon characterized primarily by decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and other inflammatory mediators, whereas the expression of other genes are induced or unchanged. Endotoxin tolerance is induced by prior exposure of murine macrophages/human monocytes, experimental animals, or people to TLR ligands. Although recent studies reported a possible relationship between endotoxin tolerance and differentiation of alternatively activated macrophages (AA-MΦs or M2), we show in this study that LPS pretreatment of IL-4Rα(-/-) and STAT6(-/-) macrophages, which fail to develop into AA-MΦs, resulted in tolerance of proinflammatory cytokines, as well as molecules and chemokines previously associated with AA-MΦs (e.g., arginase-1, mannose receptor, CCL2, CCL17, and CCL22). In contrast to LPS, wild-type (WT) MΦs pretreated with IL-4, the prototype inducer of AA-MΦs, did not induce endotoxin tolerance with respect to proinflammatory cytokines, AA-MΦ-associated chemokines, negative regulators, NF-κB binding and subunit composition, and MAPKs; conversely, IL-13(-/-) macrophages were tolerized equivalently to WT MΦs by LPS pretreatment. Further, IL-4Rα deficiency did not affect the reversal of endotoxin tolerance exerted by the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. Like WT mice, 100% of LPS-tolerized IL-4Rα-deficient mice survived LPS + d-galactosamine-induced lethal toxicity and exhibited decreased serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines and AA-MΦ-associated chemokines induced by LPS challenge compared with nontolerized mice. These data indicate that the signaling pathways leading to endotoxin tolerance and differentiation of AA-MΦs are dissociable.
内毒素耐受是一种复杂的现象,其主要特征是促炎细胞因子、趋化因子和其他炎症介质的产生减少,而其他基因的表达则被诱导或不变。内毒素耐受是通过先前暴露于 TLR 配体的鼠巨噬细胞/人单核细胞、实验动物或人诱导的。尽管最近的研究报道内毒素耐受与选择性激活的巨噬细胞(AA-MΦ 或 M2)的分化之间可能存在关系,但我们在这项研究中表明,IL-4Rα(-/-)和 STAT6(-/-)巨噬细胞(不能分化为 AA-MΦ)预先用 LPS 处理会导致促炎细胞因子以及先前与 AA-MΦ 相关的分子和趋化因子(例如,精氨酸酶-1、甘露糖受体、CCL2、CCL17 和 CCL22)的耐受。与 LPS 相反,用 AA-MΦ 的原型诱导剂 IL-4 预处理的野生型(WT)MΦ 不会导致与促炎细胞因子、AA-MΦ 相关趋化因子、负调节剂、NF-κB 结合和亚基组成以及 MAPKs 相关的内毒素耐受;相反,用 LPS 预处理的 IL-13(-/-)巨噬细胞与 WT MΦ 一样耐受。此外,IL-4Rα 缺陷并不影响组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂曲古抑菌素 A 逆转内毒素耐受。与 WT 小鼠一样,100%的 LPS 耐受的 IL-4Rα 缺陷小鼠在 LPS + D-半乳糖胺诱导的致死毒性中存活下来,并且与未耐受的小鼠相比,血清中 LPS 刺激诱导的促炎细胞因子和 AA-MΦ 相关趋化因子的水平降低。这些数据表明,导致内毒素耐受和 AA-MΦ 分化的信号通路是可分离的。