• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人智力障碍严重程度的评估：学习障碍筛查问卷的莫肯分层分析。

Estimating the severity of intellectual disability in adults: a Mokken scaling analysis of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire.

机构信息

Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):1002-6. doi: 10.1037/a0032369. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1037/a0032369
PMID:23544397
Abstract

A Mokken scaling analysis of the learning disability screening questionnaire (LDSQ) suggested that, with the exception of 1 item, the scale conforms to the properties of a Mokken scale. This has advantages for estimating the severity of intellectual disability and inferring the difficulties likely to be experienced by an individual for whom there is incomplete information on intellectual and adaptive functioning.

摘要

一项学习障碍筛查问卷（LDSQ）的莫肯分级分析表明，除了 1 个项目外，该量表符合莫肯量表的特性。这对于估计智力障碍的严重程度和推断对于那些在智力和适应功能方面信息不完整的个体可能遇到的困难具有优势。

相似文献

1
Estimating the severity of intellectual disability in adults: a Mokken scaling analysis of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire.成人智力障碍严重程度的评估：学习障碍筛查问卷的莫肯分层分析。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):1002-6. doi: 10.1037/a0032369. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
2
Validating the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire Against the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition.验证学习障碍筛查问卷与韦氏成人智力量表第四版的相关性。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Aug;53(4):301-7. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-53.4.301.
3
Estimating the level of functional ability of children identified as likely to have an intellectual disability.评估被认为可能存在智力残疾的儿童的功能能力水平。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Nov;34(11):4009-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
4
Screening for offenders with an intellectual disability: the validity of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire.筛查智障罪犯：学习障碍筛查问卷的有效性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):791-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
5
An analysis of differential item functioning by gender in the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ).学习障碍筛查问卷（LDSQ）中按性别进行的项目功能差异分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Apr;39:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
6
An Independent Investigation of the Utility of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) within a Community Learning Disability Team.社区学习障碍团队中学习障碍筛查问卷（LDSQ）效用的独立调查
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Mar;31(2):e223-e228. doi: 10.1111/jar.12316. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
7
Using the learning disability screening questionnaire to help identify people with an intellectual disability in homeless services.利用学习障碍筛查问卷帮助识别无家可归服务人群中的智障人士。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Nov;36(6):1319-1325. doi: 10.1111/jar.13150. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
8
Forensic issues in learning disability.
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2004;14(2 Suppl):S53-5.
9
Learning capacity in adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities.
Psychol Rep. 2009 Dec;105(3 Pt 1):804-14. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.3.804-814.
10
The evaluation of a screening tool for children with an intellectual disability: the Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire.评估儿童智力障碍的筛查工具：儿童青少年智力障碍筛查问卷。
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):1068-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Bias in Point Estimates and Standard Errors of Mokken's Scalability Coefficients.莫肯量表系数点估计值和标准误差中的偏差。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Jul;40(5):331-345. doi: 10.1177/0146621616638500. Epub 2016 Apr 7.