• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用学习障碍筛查问卷帮助识别无家可归服务人群中的智障人士。

Using the learning disability screening questionnaire to help identify people with an intellectual disability in homeless services.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

GCM Records LLP, Berwick upon Tweed, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Nov;36(6):1319-1325. doi: 10.1111/jar.13150. Epub 2023 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1111/jar.13150
PMID:37635318
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We explored the accuracy of using the learning disability screening questionnaire (LDSQ) in services for people experiencing homelessness in the United Kingdom.

METHOD

We examined the concordance between the LDSQ outcomes and assessments of intellectual disability. Seventy adults experiencing homelessness completed the LDSQ. Staff completed the LDSQ and a measure of adaptive functioning for 38 of this group. Nine participants received an intellectual assessment.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity for the LDSQ when completed by staff was 83% and 96% respectively and 50% and 92% when completed by the individual. Seven people had intellectual and adaptive functioning in the intellectual disability range.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the LDSQ would be an appropriate and beneficial screening tool to use within services for people experiencing homelessness. More accurate results would be likely if it were completed by staff.

摘要

背景

我们探索了在英国为无家可归者提供服务时使用学习障碍筛查问卷(LDSQ)的准确性。

方法

我们检查了 LDSQ 结果与智力障碍评估之间的一致性。70 名无家可归的成年人完成了 LDSQ。工作人员为其中 38 人完成了 LDSQ 和一项适应功能的测量。9 名参与者接受了智力评估。

结果

工作人员完成的 LDSQ 的敏感性和特异性分别为 83%和 96%,而个人完成的敏感性和特异性分别为 50%和 92%。有 7 人在智力和适应功能方面处于智力障碍范围内。

结论

结果表明,LDSQ 将是在为无家可归者提供服务中使用的一种合适且有益的筛查工具。如果由工作人员完成,结果可能会更准确。

相似文献

1
Using the learning disability screening questionnaire to help identify people with an intellectual disability in homeless services.利用学习障碍筛查问卷帮助识别无家可归服务人群中的智障人士。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Nov;36(6):1319-1325. doi: 10.1111/jar.13150. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
2
The impact of an adult intellectual disability screening questionnaire on service providers and users.成人智力残疾筛查问卷对服务提供者和使用者的影响。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 May;33(3):457-464. doi: 10.1111/jar.12687. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
3
An Independent Investigation of the Utility of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) within a Community Learning Disability Team.社区学习障碍团队中学习障碍筛查问卷(LDSQ)效用的独立调查
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Mar;31(2):e223-e228. doi: 10.1111/jar.12316. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
4
Homelessness-'It will crumble men': The views of staff and service users about facilitating the identification and support of people with an intellectual disability in homeless services.无家可归者:“它会摧毁人们”:工作人员和服务使用者对在无家可归者服务中促进识别和支持智障人士的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):e514-e521. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12750. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
5
An analysis of differential item functioning by gender in the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ).学习障碍筛查问卷(LDSQ)中按性别进行的项目功能差异分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Apr;39:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
6
Validating the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire Against the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition.验证学习障碍筛查问卷与韦氏成人智力量表第四版的相关性。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Aug;53(4):301-7. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-53.4.301.
7
Homelessness and people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the international research evidence.无家可归者与智障人士:对国际研究证据的系统综述
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Mar;34(2):390-401. doi: 10.1111/jar.12815. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
8
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
9
Estimating the severity of intellectual disability in adults: a Mokken scaling analysis of the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire.成人智力障碍严重程度的评估:学习障碍筛查问卷的莫肯分层分析。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):1002-6. doi: 10.1037/a0032369. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
10
Intellectual disability in homeless adults: a prevalence study.无家可归成年人的智力残疾:一项患病率研究。
J Intellect Disabil. 2008 Dec;12(4):325-34. doi: 10.1177/1744629508100496.

引用本文的文献

1
Indicators for Intellectual Disability Where No Formal Diagnosis Exists but Nursing Knowledge Demonstrates Grounds for a Formal Assessment: A Scoping Review.虽无正式诊断但护理知识表明有进行正式评估依据的智力残疾指标:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 21;13(13):1489. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131489.
2
Exploration of a somatosensory interactive assessment tool for children with intellectual disabilities.探索一种用于智障儿童的体感互动评估工具。
Psych J. 2024 Oct;13(5):804-812. doi: 10.1002/pchj.759. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
The views of people using homeless services about learning disability.
使用无家可归者服务人群对学习障碍的看法。
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 Dec;28(4):1155-1165. doi: 10.1177/17446295231215412. Epub 2023 Nov 10.