Niemeyer M G, Ascoop C A, Cramer M J, Verzijlbergen J F, Go T L, van der Wall E E, Zwinderman A H, Pauwels E K
Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 1990 May;11(5):413-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059724.
In this study the role of visual assessment and quantitative analysis of thallium-201 myocardial stress perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) was evaluated in patients with a normal electrocardiogram (ECG) (group I) and in patients with an abnormal baseline repolarization on the ECG (group II). One-hundred-and-thirty-five patients were studied. Group I consisted of 93 patients, 65 of whom had coronary artery disease (CAD), i.e. a luminal stenosis of greater than or equal to 50%; group II consisted of 42 patients, 32 of whom had CAD. In group II the exercise ECG was considered uninterpretable and thus only visual and quantitative analysis of MPS was investigated. Sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography, visual assessment and quantitative analysis of MPS were not significantly different in group I: sensitivities of the three methods were 66, 62 and 55% respectively, and specificities 86, 79 and 96% respectively. In group II there were no significant differences in the sensitivities and specificities of visual assessment or quantitative analysis of MPS: sensitivities of the two methods being both 88% and specificities both 80%. Visual assessment of redistribution (P less than 0.05) and quantitative analysis of washout (P less than 0.005) was significantly superior in group II than in group I; probably because of a higher incidence of three-vessel disease in the second group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在本研究中,对心电图(ECG)正常的患者(第一组)和心电图基线复极异常的患者(第二组),评估了201铊心肌负荷灌注闪烁显像(MPS)的视觉评估和定量分析的作用。共研究了135例患者。第一组由93例患者组成,其中65例患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD),即管腔狭窄大于或等于50%;第二组由42例患者组成,其中32例患有CAD。在第二组中,运动心电图被认为无法解读,因此仅研究了MPS的视觉评估和定量分析。在第一组中,运动心电图、MPS的视觉评估和定量分析的敏感性和特异性无显著差异:三种方法的敏感性分别为66%、62%和55%,特异性分别为86%、79%和96%。在第二组中,MPS的视觉评估或定量分析的敏感性和特异性无显著差异:两种方法的敏感性均为88%,特异性均为80%。第二组中再分布的视觉评估(P<0.05)和洗脱的定量分析(P<0.005)显著优于第一组;可能是因为第二组三支血管病变的发生率较高。(摘要截断于250字)