Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Jul;55(7):593-601. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12147. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
This study reviewed evidence regarding the effect of motivational rehabilitation interventions on outcomes in children with cerebral palsy. Six databases were searched for literature published up to May 2012. Included studies measured the purported motivating effects of motor-based rehabilitation interventions and the measured impact on outcomes. The American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) systematic review methodology was used as a framework. Eight studies evaluated outcomes of studies using virtual reality interventions and one in a functional therapy context. Conflicting evidence from three (level II and level III) studies exists about the impact of these motivating interventions on motor outcomes measured in body functions. No statistical evidence regarding activity and participation outcomes exists. A single level II study found no significant difference in participants' motivation between motivational and conventional interventions. This review revealed a paucity of research on the effects of motivational interventions. Weaknesses include a lack of consistency in the examination of motivational interventions, limited use of definitions or theories to ground the concept of motivation, and reliance on non-validated methodological tools. This body of evidence would be strengthened by the use and development of robust outcome measures of motivation.
本研究回顾了动机康复干预对脑瘫儿童结局影响的证据。 为查找截至 2012 年 5 月的文献,我们对 6 个数据库进行了检索。 纳入的研究均测量了基于运动的康复干预的预期激励效果及其对结局的影响。 我们采用美国脑瘫与发育医学学会(AACPDM)系统评价方法作为框架。 有 8 项研究评估了虚拟现实干预的研究结果,1 项研究评估了功能治疗环境中的结果。 3 项(II 级和 III 级)研究关于这些激励干预对身体功能测量的运动结局的影响存在相互矛盾的证据。 关于活动和参与结局没有统计学证据。 一项 II 级研究发现,激励干预和常规干预组参与者的动机没有显著差异。 本综述显示,有关激励干预效果的研究较少。 不足之处包括缺乏对激励干预的一致性检查,对动机概念的定义或理论的使用有限,以及依赖非验证性的方法学工具。 通过使用和开发更可靠的动机结局测量工具,可以增强这方面的证据。