Suppr超能文献

覆膜自膨式金属支架置入术有望使边界可切除胰头癌患者安全接受新辅助放化疗。

Covered self-expandable metal stent deployment promises safe neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26(1):77-86. doi: 10.1111/den.12049. Epub 2013 Mar 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer (BRPHC) have been treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) using metallic stents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of covered self-expanding metallic stents (CSEMS) during the NACRT and surgical period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the outcomes of patients with BRPHC, then divided them chronologically into three groups as follows. Group A: upfront surgery with plastic stent (PS) deployment; group B: PS deployment plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and/or NACRT; group C: CSEMS deployment plus NAC/NACRT. Patients were categorized as borderline resectable based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, 2010. Days to reintervention (DR), reintervention rate, and the rate of R0 and complications were studied. Safe margin-negative resection (R0) surgery was defined as R0 surgery without reintervention during the NACRT period and no postoperative complications.

RESULTS

DR were as follows. Groups A, B and C were 32, 55 and 97 days, respectively (P < 0.05). R0 surgery obtained in groups A, B and C was 53% (9/17), 100% (17/17) and 93% (14/15), respectively. CSEMS did not interfere with surgery. Safe R0 surgery obtained in groups B and C was 11% (2/19) and 67% (10/15), respectively (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the odds ratio for safe R0 surgery was 16.210 (95% CI 2.457-106.962, P = 0.003) for CSEMS placement.

CONCLUSION

CSEMS should be considered to relieve symptomatic biliary obstruction in patients with BRPHC receiving NACRT in view of the high attainability rate of safe R0 surgery compared to that with PS deployment.

摘要

背景

接受新辅助放化疗(NACRT)的边界可切除胰头癌(BRPHC)患者已使用金属支架进行治疗。本研究旨在评估在 NACRT 和手术期间使用覆膜自膨式金属支架(CSEMS)的疗效和并发症。

患者和方法

我们回顾了 BRPHC 患者的治疗结果,并按时间顺序将其分为三组。A 组:手术前行塑料支架(PS)植入;B 组:PS 植入加新辅助化疗(NAC)和/或 NACRT;C 组:CSEMS 植入加 NAC/NACRT。根据 2010 年国家综合癌症网络指南,患者被归类为边界可切除。研究了再干预天数(DR)、再干预率以及 R0 率和并发症。安全切缘阴性切除(R0)手术定义为在 NACRT 期间无需再干预且无术后并发症的 R0 手术。

结果

DR 如下。A、B 和 C 组分别为 32、55 和 97 天(P<0.05)。A、B 和 C 组的 R0 手术分别为 53%(17/32)、100%(17/17)和 93%(15/16)。CSEMS 并未干扰手术。B 组和 C 组的安全 R0 手术分别为 11%(2/19)和 67%(10/15)(P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,CSEMS 放置的安全 R0 手术的优势比为 16.210(95%CI 2.457-106.962,P=0.003)。

结论

鉴于与 PS 植入相比,CSEMS 可实现较高的安全 R0 手术率,因此在接受 NACRT 的 BRPHC 患者中,应考虑使用 CSEMS 来缓解症状性胆道梗阻。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验