North Carolina Rural Health Research and Policy Analysis Center, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
J Rural Health. 2013 Spring;29(2):140-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00425.x. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
To compare the financial performance of rural hospitals with Medicare payment provisions to those paid under prospective payment and to estimate the financial consequences of elimination of the Critical Access Hospital (CAH) program.
Financial data for 2004-2010 were collected from the Healthcare Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS) for rural hospitals. HCRIS data were used to calculate measures of the profitability, liquidity, capital structure, and financial strength of rural hospitals. Linear mixed models accounted for the method of Medicare reimbursement, time trends, hospital, and market characteristics. Simulations were used to estimate profitability of CAHs if they reverted to prospective payment.
CAHs generally had lower unadjusted financial performance than other types of rural hospitals, but after adjustment for hospital characteristics, CAHs had generally higher financial performance.
Special payment provisions by Medicare to rural hospitals are important determinants of financial performance. In particular, the financial condition of CAHs would be worse if they were paid under prospective payment.
比较具有医疗保险支付条款的农村医院与按预期付款支付的农村医院的财务绩效,并估计取消关键访问医院(CAH)计划的财务后果。
从农村医院的医疗保健成本报告信息系统(HCRIS)中收集了 2004-2010 年的财务数据。使用 HCRIS 数据来计算农村医院盈利能力、流动性、资本结构和财务实力的衡量标准。线性混合模型考虑了医疗保险报销方式、时间趋势、医院和市场特征。模拟用于估计 CAH 如果恢复为预期付款的盈利能力。
CAH 通常具有较低的未经调整的财务绩效,而其他类型的农村医院,但在调整医院特征后,CAH 通常具有更高的财务绩效。
医疗保险向农村医院提供的特殊支付条款是财务绩效的重要决定因素。特别是,如果 CAH 按预期付款支付,其财务状况将更糟。