Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34980.
Rural US residents disproportionately rely on emergency departments (ED), yet little is known about patient outcomes after ED visits to rural hospitals or critical access hospitals (CAHs).
To compare 30-day outcomes after rural vs urban ED visits and in CAHs, a subset of rural hospitals.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study used a 20% sample of national Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from January 1, 2011, to October 31, 2015. Rural and urban ED visits were matched on demographics, patient prior use of EDs, comorbidities, and diagnoses. Thirty-day outcomes overall and stratified by 25 common ED diagnoses were evaluated, with similar analysis of CAHs vs non-CAHs. Data were analyzed from February 15, 2020, to May 17, 2021.
The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were ED revisits with and without hospitalization.
The matched cohort included 473 152 rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries with a mean (SD) age of 75.1 (7.9) years (59.1% and 59.3% women, respectively; 86.9% and 87.1% White, respectively). Medicare beneficiaries at rural vs urban EDs experienced similar all-cause 30-day mortality (3.9% vs 4.1%; effect size, 0.01), ED revisits (18.1% vs 17.8%; effect size, 0.00), and ED revisits with hospitalization (6.0% vs 8.1%; effect size, 0.00). Rural ED visits were associated with more transfer (6.2% vs 2.0%; effect size, 0.22) and fewer hospitalizations (24.7% vs 39.2; effect size, 0.31). Stratified by diagnosis, patients in rural EDs with life-threatening illnesses experienced more transfer with 30-day mortality similar to that of patients in urban EDs. In contrast, mortality differed for patients in rural EDs with symptom-based diagnoses, including chest pain (odds ratio [OR], 1.54 [95% CI, 1.25-1.89]), nausea and vomiting (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.26-2.24), and abdominal pain (OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.42-2.10]). All findings were similar for CAHs.
The findings of this cohort study of rural ED care suggest that patient mortality for potentially life-threatening conditions is comparable to that in urban settings. Further research is needed to understand the sources of greater rural ED mortality for symptom-based conditions. These findings underscore the importance of ensuring access to treatment of life-threatening conditions at local EDs in rural communities, which are increasingly endangered by hospital closures.
美国农村居民过度依赖急诊部(ED),但对于农村医院或基层医疗保健医院(CAHs)的农村 ED 就诊后的患者结局知之甚少。
比较农村与城市 ED 就诊和 CAHs(农村医院的一个子集)后的 30 天结局。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究,使用了 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 10 月 31 日国家医疗保险按服务收费受益人的 20%样本。农村和城市 ED 就诊在人口统计学、患者先前使用 ED、合并症和诊断方面进行匹配。评估了总体和 25 种常见 ED 诊断的分层 30 天结局,并对 CAHs 与非 CAHs 进行了类似分析。数据于 2020 年 2 月 15 日至 2021 年 5 月 17 日进行分析。
主要结局是 30 天全因死亡率。次要结局是 ED 复诊有无住院。
匹配队列包括 473152 名农村和城市 Medicare 受益人的平均(SD)年龄为 75.1(7.9)岁(分别为 59.1%和 59.3%为女性,分别为 86.9%和 87.1%为白人)。农村与城市 ED 就诊的 Medicare 患者 30 天全因死亡率相似(3.9%对 4.1%;效应量为 0.01),ED 复诊率(18.1%对 17.8%;效应量为 0.00),ED 复诊伴住院率(6.0%对 8.1%;效应量为 0.00)。农村 ED 就诊更倾向于转院(6.2%对 2.0%;效应量为 0.22)和更少的住院(24.7%对 39.2%;效应量为 0.31)。按诊断分层,患有危及生命疾病的农村 ED 患者的转院率更高,但死亡率与城市 ED 患者相似。相比之下,农村 ED 患者的症状性诊断(包括胸痛[比值比(OR),1.54(95%CI,1.25-1.89])、恶心和呕吐(OR,1.68(95%CI,1.26-2.24))和腹痛(OR,1.73(95%CI,1.42-2.10))患者的死亡率存在差异。CAHs 的所有发现均相似。
本农村 ED 护理队列研究的结果表明,潜在危及生命的疾病患者的死亡率与城市环境相当。需要进一步研究以了解农村 ED 对基于症状的疾病死亡率较高的原因。这些发现强调了确保在农村社区的当地 ED 获得危及生命疾病治疗的重要性,而农村社区的 ED 正在因医院关闭而日益受到威胁。