Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Dept. of Philosophy, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(5):33-41. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.776128.
Over the years a number of countries have abolished anonymous gamete donation and shifted toward open-identity policies. Donor-conceived children are said to have a fundamental "right to know" the identity of their donor. In this article, we trace the arguments that underlie this claim and question its implications. We argue that, given the status attributed to the right to know one's gamete donor, it would be discriminatory not to extend this right to naturally conceived children with misattributed paternity. One way to facilitate this would be through routine paternity testing at birth. While this proposal is likely to raise concerns about the conflicting interests and rights of other people involved, we show that similar concerns apply to the context of open-identity gamete donation. Unless one can identify a rational basis for treating the two groups differently, one's stance toward both cases should be the same.
多年来,许多国家已经废除了匿名配子捐赠,并转向公开身份政策。据称,供体孕育的孩子享有了解其供体身份的“基本权利”。本文追溯了这一主张的论据,并质疑了其含义。我们认为,鉴于赋予了解自身配子供体的权利的地位,如果不将这一权利扩大到因错认父亲而身份不明的自然孕育的孩子,那将是歧视性的。一种实现这一目标的方法是在出生时进行常规的亲子鉴定。虽然这一提议可能会引起对涉及的其他人的利益和权利冲突的担忧,但我们表明,类似的担忧也适用于公开身份配子捐赠的情况。除非能够确定对待这两个群体的不同有合理的依据,否则对这两种情况的立场应该是相同的。