Griffiths Danielle
Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation, The University of Manchester, 3.383 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Health Care Anal. 2016 Sep;24(3):196-209. doi: 10.1007/s10728-016-0329-z.
Advances in medicine in the latter half of the twentieth century have dramatically altered human bodies, expanding choices around what we do with them and how they connect to other bodies. Nowhere is this more so than in the area of reproductive technologies (RTs). Reproductive medicine and the laws surrounding it in the UK have reconfigured traditional boundaries surrounding parenthood and the family. Yet culture and regulation surrounding RTs have combined to try to ensure that while traditional boundaries may be pushed, they are reconstructed in similar ways. This paper looks at the most recent RT to be permitted in the UK, mitochondria (mtDNA) replacement therapy (MRT). Despite controversial media headlines surrounding the technique, MRT is in fact an example of how science and regulation seek to expand models of traditional relatedness in a way that doesn't challenge the existing order. Yet, like other RTs, while attempts are made to ensure it doesn't push traditional boundaries too far, fissures and inconsistencies appear in law and culture, which give interesting insights into how genetics, parentage and identity are being mediated in new but familiar ways.
二十世纪后半叶医学的进步极大地改变了人类身体,拓宽了我们对身体的处置方式以及它们与其他身体联系方式的选择范围。这在生殖技术(RTs)领域表现得尤为明显。英国的生殖医学及其相关法律重新划定了围绕亲子关系和家庭的传统界限。然而,围绕生殖技术的文化和监管共同作用,试图确保虽然传统界限可能被突破,但它们会以类似的方式重新构建。本文探讨了英国最近允许的一种生殖技术——线粒体(mtDNA)替代疗法(MRT)。尽管媒体对该技术的报道引发了争议,但MRT实际上是一个例子,说明科学和监管如何试图以一种不挑战现有秩序的方式扩展传统亲属关系模式。然而,与其他生殖技术一样,尽管人们试图确保它不会过度突破传统界限,但法律和文化中仍出现了裂痕和不一致之处,这为我们洞察遗传学、亲子关系和身份认同如何以新的但又似曾相识的方式得到调节提供了有趣的视角。