University of California, Berkeley, 50 University Hall, MC#7360, Berkeley, CA, 94720.
Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):1730-49. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12060. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
To test the effectiveness of a telephone care management intervention to increase the use of primary and preventive care, reduce hospital admissions, and reduce emergency department visits for Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities in a managed care setting.
Four years (2007-2011) of Medicaid claims data on blind and/or disabled beneficiaries, aged 20-64.
Randomized control trial with an intervention group (n = 3,540) that was enrolled in managed care with telephone care management and a control group (n = 1,524) who remained in fee-for-service system without care management services. Multi-disciplinary care coordination teams provided telephone services to the intervention group to address patients' medical and social needs.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION: Medicaid claims and encounter data for all participants were obtained from the state and the managed care organization.
There was no significant difference in use of primary care, specialist visits, hospital admissions, and emergency department between the intervention and the control group. Care managers experienced challenges in keeping members engaged in the intervention and maintaining contact by telephone.
The lack of success for Medicaid beneficiaries, along with other recent studies, suggests that more intensive and more targeted interventions may be more effective for the high-needs population.
在管理式医疗环境中,测试电话护理管理干预措施对增加初级和预防保健的使用、减少残疾的医疗补助受益人住院和急诊就诊的有效性。
四年(2007-2011 年)的盲人和/或残疾受益人、年龄 20-64 岁的医疗补助索赔数据。
一项随机对照试验,干预组(n=3540)参加管理式医疗和电话护理管理,对照组(n=1524)继续在没有护理管理服务的按服务收费系统中。多学科护理协调团队为干预组提供电话服务,以满足患者的医疗和社会需求。
数据收集/提取:从州和管理式医疗组织获得所有参与者的医疗补助索赔和就诊数据。
干预组和对照组在初级保健、专科就诊、住院和急诊就诊方面没有显著差异。护理经理在使成员参与干预和通过电话保持联系方面遇到了挑战。
医疗补助受益人的干预措施缺乏成效,加上其他最近的研究表明,对于高需求人群,更密集和更有针对性的干预措施可能更有效。