Suppr超能文献

电话护理管理在协调医疗补助受益人参加强制性医疗保险中的护理效果:一项随机对照研究。

Telephone care management's effectiveness in coordinating care for Medicaid beneficiaries in managed care: a randomized controlled study.

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley, 50 University Hall, MC#7360, Berkeley, CA, 94720.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):1730-49. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12060. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the effectiveness of a telephone care management intervention to increase the use of primary and preventive care, reduce hospital admissions, and reduce emergency department visits for Medicaid beneficiaries with disabilities in a managed care setting.

DATA SOURCE

Four years (2007-2011) of Medicaid claims data on blind and/or disabled beneficiaries, aged 20-64.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized control trial with an intervention group (n = 3,540) that was enrolled in managed care with telephone care management and a control group (n = 1,524) who remained in fee-for-service system without care management services. Multi-disciplinary care coordination teams provided telephone services to the intervention group to address patients' medical and social needs.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION: Medicaid claims and encounter data for all participants were obtained from the state and the managed care organization.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There was no significant difference in use of primary care, specialist visits, hospital admissions, and emergency department between the intervention and the control group. Care managers experienced challenges in keeping members engaged in the intervention and maintaining contact by telephone.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of success for Medicaid beneficiaries, along with other recent studies, suggests that more intensive and more targeted interventions may be more effective for the high-needs population.

摘要

目的

在管理式医疗环境中,测试电话护理管理干预措施对增加初级和预防保健的使用、减少残疾的医疗补助受益人住院和急诊就诊的有效性。

数据来源

四年(2007-2011 年)的盲人和/或残疾受益人、年龄 20-64 岁的医疗补助索赔数据。

研究设计

一项随机对照试验,干预组(n=3540)参加管理式医疗和电话护理管理,对照组(n=1524)继续在没有护理管理服务的按服务收费系统中。多学科护理协调团队为干预组提供电话服务,以满足患者的医疗和社会需求。

数据收集/提取:从州和管理式医疗组织获得所有参与者的医疗补助索赔和就诊数据。

主要发现

干预组和对照组在初级保健、专科就诊、住院和急诊就诊方面没有显著差异。护理经理在使成员参与干预和通过电话保持联系方面遇到了挑战。

结论

医疗补助受益人的干预措施缺乏成效,加上其他最近的研究表明,对于高需求人群,更密集和更有针对性的干预措施可能更有效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Comprehensive Cardiac Care: How Much Does It Cost?全面心脏护理:费用是多少?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 11;20(6):4980. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064980.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验