Suppr超能文献

初级保健中预防2型糖尿病和心血管疾病的生活方式干预的经济评估:一项随机对照试验。

Economic evaluation of a lifestyle intervention in primary care to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

van Wier Marieke F, Lakerveld Jeroen, Bot Sandra D M, Chinapaw Mai J M, Nijpels Giel, van Tulder Maurits W

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Apr 4;14:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-45.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cost-effectiveness studies of lifestyle interventions in people at risk for lifestyle-related diseases, addressing 'real-world' implementation, are needed. This study examines the cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention from a societal perspective, compared with provision of health brochures, alongside a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Adults aged 30-50 years, at risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD), were recruited from twelve general practices in The Netherlands. They were randomized to the intervention (n = 314) or control group (n = 308). The intervention consisted of up to six face-to-face counseling sessions with a trained practice nurse, followed by three-monthly sessions by phone. Costs were collected using three-monthly retrospective questionnaires. Quality of life was measured with the EuroQol-5D-3L, at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months. Nine-year risk of developing T2DM and ten-year risk of CVD mortality were estimated using the ARIC and SCORE formulae, respectively, based on measurements at baseline and 24 months while applying a fixed age of 60 years at both time points.

RESULTS

Small, statistically non-significant differences in effects were found between the intervention and control group with regard to risk scores and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) gained. The mean difference in costs between the intervention and control group was €-866 (95% confidence interval -2372; 370). The probability that the intervention was cost-effective varied from 93% at €8000/QALY to 88% at €80,000/QALY.

CONCLUSION

A primary care lifestyle intervention aimed at adults at increased risk of T2DM and/or CVD could result in cost savings over a two-year period. However, due to methodological uncertainty no advice can be given regarding the implementation of the intervention in Dutch general practices.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN59358434.

摘要

背景

需要针对有生活方式相关疾病风险的人群进行生活方式干预的成本效益研究,以解决“现实世界”中的实施问题。本研究从社会角度考察了与提供健康宣传册相比,一项初级保健干预措施的成本效益,并同时开展了一项随机对照试验。

方法

从荷兰的12家普通诊所招募了年龄在30至50岁、有2型糖尿病(T2DM)和/或心血管疾病(CVD)风险的成年人。他们被随机分为干预组(n = 314)或对照组(n = 308)。干预措施包括由一名经过培训的执业护士进行多达六次面对面咨询,随后每三个月进行一次电话随访。使用每三个月的回顾性问卷收集成本数据。在基线、6个月、12个月和24个月时,使用欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQol-5D-3L)测量生活质量。分别根据基线和24个月时的测量结果,应用ARIC和SCORE公式,同时在两个时间点设定固定年龄60岁,估计患T2DM的9年风险和CVD死亡的10年风险。

结果

在风险评分和获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)方面,干预组和对照组之间发现了微小的、统计学上无显著差异的效应。干预组和对照组之间的平均成本差异为-866欧元(95%置信区间-2372;370)。干预措施具有成本效益的概率从每QALY 8000欧元时的93%到每QALY 80000欧元时的88%不等。

结论

针对有T2DM和/或CVD风险增加的成年人的初级保健生活方式干预措施,在两年期间可能会节省成本。然而,由于方法学上的不确定性,无法就该干预措施在荷兰普通诊所的实施给出建议。

试验注册

当前受控试验ISRCTN59358434。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验