• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于试验的临床和经济分析:对一致性的无益追求。

Trial-based clinical and economic analyses: the unhelpful quest for conformity.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Blusson Hall 10504, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2013 Dec 5;14:421. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-421.

DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-14-421
PMID:24308301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4233716/
Abstract

Where there is conformity across the findings, interpretation and implications of 'clinical' and 'economic' research, there is limited cause for concern. However, there is often unease when apparent contradictory conclusions are drawn from the same study. Given the ever increasing role for economic evaluation in healthcare decision making, this commentary challenges the necessity of compatibility between clinical and economic evaluation.

摘要

如果“临床”和“经济”研究的结果、解释和影响一致,就没有什么值得关注的。但是,如果从同一研究中得出明显矛盾的结论,往往会让人感到不安。鉴于经济评估在医疗保健决策中的作用日益增加,本文评论质疑了临床和经济评估之间兼容性的必要性。

相似文献

1
Trial-based clinical and economic analyses: the unhelpful quest for conformity.基于试验的临床和经济分析:对一致性的无益追求。
Trials. 2013 Dec 5;14:421. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-421.
2
Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies.医疗保健经济评估研究中的可推广性:综述与案例研究
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(49):iii-iv, 1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta8490.
3
'Not clinically effective but cost-effective' - paradoxical conclusions in randomised controlled trials with 'doubly null' results: a cross-sectional study.“无临床疗效但具有成本效益”——具有“双重无效”结果的随机对照试验中的矛盾结论:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e029596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029596.
4
Bone graft substitutes for the treatment of traumatic fractures of the extremities.用于治疗四肢创伤性骨折的骨移植替代物。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2012;8:Doc04. doi: 10.3205/hta000102. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Methods for economic evaluation alongside a multicentre trial in developing countries: a case study from the WHO Antenatal Care Randomised Controlled Trial.发展中国家多中心试验中的经济评估方法:来自世界卫生组织产前护理随机对照试验的案例研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 2:75-97. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00008.x.
7
Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).患者报告结局(PRO)在卫生技术评估(HTA)中的信息价值。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092.
8
Timely and complete publication of economic evaluations alongside randomized controlled trials.及时完整地发表经济评价 alongside 随机对照试验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jan;31(1):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0004-7.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report.与临床试验并行的成本效益分析II——一份药物经济学与结果研究协会良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2015 Mar;18(2):161-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001.
10
Cost-utility analysis conducted alongside randomized controlled trials: are economic end points considered in sample size calculations and does it matter?伴随随机对照试验进行的成本-效用分析:经济终点是否被纳入样本量计算中?这有关系吗?
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):43-53. doi: 10.1177/1740774512465358. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions Related to the Treatment of Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Scoping Review.多囊卵巢综合征女性治疗相关干预措施的成本效益:一项范围综述
Int J Womens Health. 2025 May 8;17:1333-1341. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S514423. eCollection 2025.
2
The cost-effectiveness of adding an ultrasound corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection to advice and education for hip osteoarthritis.在髋关节骨关节炎的建议和教育基础上增加超声引导下皮质类固醇和局部麻醉剂注射的成本效益。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Jan 1;64(1):165-172. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead659.
3
Cost-effectiveness of palbociclib in early breast cancer patients with a high risk of relapse: Results from the PENELOPE-B trial.哌柏西利在高复发风险早期乳腺癌患者中的成本效益:PENELOPE-B试验结果
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 5;12:886831. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.886831. eCollection 2022.
4
Responsiveness of Vision-Specific and General Quality of Life Metrics to Ocular and Systemic Events in Patients with Uveitis.葡萄膜炎患者的眼部和全身事件对视力特异性和一般生活质量指标的反应。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Dec;127(12):1710-1718. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
How does the EQ-5D-5L perform in asthma patients compared with an asthma-specific quality of life questionnaire?EQ-5D-5L 在哮喘患者中的表现与哮喘特异性生活质量问卷相比如何?
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Jun 13;20(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01205-8.
6
Two speeds of increasing milk feeds for very preterm or very low-birthweight infants: the SIFT RCT.两种增加极早产儿或极低出生体重儿奶量的速度:SIFT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Apr;24(18):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta24180.
7
Economic evaluation alongside the Speed of Increasing milk Feeds Trial (SIFT).伴随增加牛奶喂养速度试验(SIFT)的经济评估。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Nov;105(6):587-592. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318346. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
8
The cost-effectiveness of progesterone in preventing miscarriages in women with early pregnancy bleeding: an economic evaluation based on the PRISM trial.孕激素预防早孕出血妇女流产的成本效益:基于 PRISM 试验的经济学评价。
BJOG. 2020 May;127(6):757-767. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16068. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Economic evaluation of a childhood obesity prevention programme for children: Results from the WAVES cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in schools.一项针对儿童的肥胖预防计划的经济学评价:在学校中进行的 WAVES 集群随机对照试验的结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219500. eCollection 2019.
10
Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.比较 EQ-5D-5L 与牛津髋关节和膝关节评分以及 SF-12 在全膝关节置换后 1 年骨关节炎患者中的有效性和反应性。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1311-1322. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1808-5. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic evaluation of a lifestyle intervention in primary care to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases: a randomized controlled trial.初级保健中预防2型糖尿病和心血管疾病的生活方式干预的经济评估:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Apr 4;14:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-45.
2
Acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: primary care based pragmatic randomised controlled trial.针刺治疗肠易激综合征:基于初级保健的实用随机对照试验。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 24;12:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-150.
3
Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care.针刺治疗肠易激综合征的成本效益:一项在初级保健中进行的实用随机对照试验的经济学评价结果。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 24;12:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-149.
4
Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting.经济评价与随机对照试验:设计、实施、分析和报告。
BMJ. 2011 Apr 7;342:d1548. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1548.
5
Using instrument-defined health state transitions to estimate minimally important differences for four preference-based health-related quality of life instruments.使用仪器定义的健康状态转变来估计四种基于偏好的健康相关生活质量工具的最小重要差异。
Med Care. 2010 Apr;48(4):365-71. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181c162a2.
6
Practical guidelines for economic evaluations alongside equivalence trials.等效性试验中的经济评估实用指南。
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00245.x.
7
Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population.脊髓损伤人群中SF - 6D健康效用量表的效度、反应度及最小重要差异
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):680-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00311.x. Epub 2008 Jan 11.
8
A brief pain management program compared with physical therapy for low back pain: results from an economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial.一项简短疼痛管理计划与物理治疗对腰痛疗效的比较:一项经济分析与随机临床试验的结果
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr 15;57(3):466-73. doi: 10.1002/art.22606.
9
National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.国家临床优化研究所及其价值判断。
BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.224.
10
Specifying objectives and outcomes for clinical trials.明确临床试验的目标和结果。
Med J Aust. 2002 May 20;176(10):491-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04522.x.