Suppr超能文献

地尔硫䓬或普萘洛尔在高血压男性运动训练期间的作用。

Effects of diltiazem or propranolol during exercise training of hypertensive men.

作者信息

Stewart K J, Effron M B, Valenti S A, Kelemen M H

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Francis Scott Key Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21224.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990 Apr;22(2):171-7.

PMID:2355813
Abstract

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to establish whether beta blockers or calcium-channel blockers limit exercise capacity and training responses in men with mild hypertension. Circuit weight and aerobic training was used to assess the effects of drugs on cardiovascular fitness and muscle strength. Fifty-two sedentary men, ages 25-59 yr, with a diastolic blood pressure of 90-105 mm Hg off drugs, without significant ST depression during maximal stress testing, received diltiazem, propranolol, or placebo. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and exercise duration during treadmill testing, as well as one-repetition maximal strength, were assessed on eight weight machines after a single-blind placebo baseline, after 2 wk of drug run-in, and after 10 wk of exercise training. Total daily doses were 240 mg for propranolol and 360 mg for diltiazem. Propranolol decreased VO2max after drug run-in (P less than 0.05). Exercise training increased VO2max (P less than 0.05) in the diltiazem and placebo groups. After training VO2max in the propranolol group increased (P less than 0.05) from run-in but not beyond baseline levels. Thus, the reduction of VO2max consequent to propranolol therapy limited the overall benefits of training. Exercise duration did not change with run-in and increased (P less than 0.05) with training by 22%, 19%, and 10% for the diltiazem, placebo, and propranolol groups, respectively. Strength after run-in was unchanged, and exercise training increased strength (P less than 0.0001) on all weight machines in all groups. The results show an advantage of diltiazem to propranolol, particularly among physically active patients engaged in aerobic exercise who require antihypertensive therapy.

摘要

这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,旨在确定β受体阻滞剂或钙通道阻滞剂是否会限制轻度高血压男性的运动能力和训练反应。采用循环重量训练和有氧训练来评估药物对心血管健康和肌肉力量的影响。52名年龄在25 - 59岁的久坐男性,在不服药时舒张压为90 - 105 mmHg,在最大应激测试期间无明显ST段压低,接受地尔硫卓、普萘洛尔或安慰剂治疗。在单盲安慰剂基线期、药物导入2周后以及运动训练10周后,在八台重量器械上评估跑步机测试期间的最大摄氧量(VO2max)和运动持续时间,以及一次重复最大力量。普萘洛尔的每日总剂量为240 mg,地尔硫卓为360 mg。药物导入后普萘洛尔降低了VO2max(P < 0.05)。运动训练使地尔硫卓组和安慰剂组的VO2max增加(P < 0.05)。训练后,普萘洛尔组的VO2max从导入期增加(P < 0.05),但未超过基线水平。因此,普萘洛尔治疗导致的VO2max降低限制了训练的总体益处。运动持续时间在导入期没有变化,训练后分别增加(P < 0.05),地尔硫卓组增加22%,安慰剂组增加19%,普萘洛尔组增加10%。导入期后的力量没有变化,运动训练使所有组的所有重量器械上的力量增加(P < 0.0001)。结果显示地尔硫卓相对于普萘洛尔具有优势,特别是在需要抗高血压治疗的进行有氧运动的体力活跃患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验