Suppr超能文献

导致 ICU 中医生在限制生命支持决策方面存在差异的因素:一项定性研究。

Factors that contribute to physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the ICU: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jun;39(6):1009-18. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2896-x. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Our aim was to explore reasons for physician variability in decisions to limit life support in the intensive care unit (ICU) utilizing qualitative methodology.

METHODS

Single center study consisting of semi-structured interviews with experienced physicians and nurses. Seventeen intensivists from medical (n = 7), surgical (n = 5), and anesthesia (n = 5) critical care backgrounds, and ten nurses from medical (n = 5) and surgical (n = 5) ICU backgrounds were interviewed. Principles of grounded theory were used to analyze the interview transcripts.

RESULTS

Eleven factors within four categories were identified that influenced physician variability in decisions to limit life support: (1) physician work environment-workload and competing priorities, shift changes and handoffs, and incorporation of nursing input; (2) physician experiences-of unexpected patient survival, and of limiting life support in physician's family; (3) physician attitudes-investment in a good surgical outcome, specialty perspective, values and beliefs; and (4) physician relationship with patient and family-hearing the patient's wishes firsthand, engagement in family communication, and family negotiation.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several factors which physicians and nurses perceived were important sources of physician variability in decisions to limit life support. Ways to raise awareness and ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of factors such as workload, competing priorities, shift changes, and handoffs should be explored. Exposing intensivists to long term patient outcomes, formalizing nursing input, providing additional training, and emphasizing firsthand knowledge of patient wishes may improve decision making.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用定性方法探讨重症监护病房(ICU)中医生在决定限制生命支持方面存在差异的原因。

方法

这是一项单中心研究,包括对有经验的医生和护士进行半结构化访谈。共访谈了 17 名来自内科(n=7)、外科(n=5)和麻醉科(n=5)重症监护背景的重症监护医生,以及 10 名来自内科(n=5)和外科(n=5)ICU 背景的护士。采用扎根理论原则分析访谈记录。

结果

确定了四个类别中的 11 个因素,这些因素影响了医生在决定限制生命支持方面的差异:(1)医生的工作环境——工作量和优先事项、轮班和交接班,以及纳入护士的意见;(2)医生的经验——意外的患者存活,以及在医生的家庭中限制生命支持;(3)医生的态度——对良好手术结果的投入、专业视角、价值观和信念;以及(4)医生与患者和家属的关系——直接听取患者的意愿、参与家属沟通以及家属协商。

结论

我们确定了一些医生和护士认为是导致医生在决定限制生命支持方面存在差异的重要因素。应探讨提高认识和减轻工作量、优先事项、轮班和交接班等因素的潜在不利影响的方法。让重症监护医生了解长期的患者预后,使护士的意见正式化,提供额外的培训,并强调直接了解患者的意愿,可能会改善决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验