• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years' clinical application for over 8,700 patients.作为产后转诊中替代核型分析的一线诊断测试的阵列比较基因组杂交——8700多名患者四年临床应用的结果
Mol Cytogenet. 2013 Apr 5;6(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-16.
2
Validation and implementation of array comparative genomic hybridisation as a first line test in place of postnatal karyotyping for genome imbalance.验证和实施阵列比较基因组杂交技术作为一线检测方法,以替代出生后核型分析用于检测基因组失衡。
Mol Cytogenet. 2010 Apr 15;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-3-9.
3
Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.阵列比较基因组杂交技术在产前诊断中的临床应用:3171 例妊娠的队列研究。
BJOG. 2012 Apr;119(5):614-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03279.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
4
Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis in neonates with congenital anomalies: detection of chromosomal imbalances.基于微阵列的先天性异常新生儿比较基因组杂交分析:染色体失衡的检测
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2015 Jan-Feb;91(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
5
Array-CGH fine mapping of minor and cryptic HR-CGH detected genomic imbalances in 80 out of 590 patients with abnormal development.对590例发育异常患者中的80例进行阵列比较基因组杂交(Array-CGH)精细定位以及微小和隐匿性高分辨率比较基因组杂交(HR-CGH),检测到基因组失衡。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2008 Nov;16(11):1318-28. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.78. Epub 2008 May 7.
6
Molecular karyotyping by array CGH in a Russian cohort of children with intellectual disability, autism, epilepsy and congenital anomalies.俄罗斯智力残疾、自闭症、癫痫和先天性异常儿童队列中基于阵列比较基因组杂交的分子核型分析
Mol Cytogenet. 2012 Dec 31;5(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-46.
7
Detection of mosaicism for genome imbalance in a cohort of 3,042 clinical cases using an oligonucleotide array CGH platform.使用寡核苷酸阵列比较基因组杂交平台在3042例临床病例队列中检测基因组失衡的嵌合体现象。
Eur J Med Genet. 2011 Mar-Apr;54(2):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
8
Multicolor banding remains an important adjunct to array CGH and conventional karyotyping.多色带分析仍然是阵列比较基因组杂交和传统核型分析的重要辅助手段。
Mol Cytogenet. 2013 Dec 5;6(1):55. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-55.
9
Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization using sex-matched reference DNA provides greater sensitivity for detection of sex chromosome imbalances than array-comparative genomic hybridization with sex-mismatched reference DNA.与使用性别不匹配参考DNA的阵列比较基因组杂交相比,使用性别匹配参考DNA的基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交在检测性染色体失衡方面具有更高的灵敏度。
J Mol Diagn. 2009 May;11(3):226-37. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080064. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
10
Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 常规核型分析技术之外的阵列比较基因组杂交技术在产前诊断中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):6-14. doi: 10.1002/uog.7754.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathogenic Copy Number Variations Involved in the Genetic Etiology of Syndromic and Non-Syndromic Intellectual Disability-Data from a Romanian Cohort.涉及综合征型和非综合征型智力障碍遗传病因的致病性拷贝数变异——来自罗马尼亚队列的数据
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;12(12):3137. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123137.
2
Chromosomal microarray in postnatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies and neurodevelopmental disorders in Serbian patients.对塞尔维亚患者先天性畸形和神经发育障碍的产后诊断中的染色体微阵列分析。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Jun;36(6):e24441. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24441. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
3
Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review.神经发育障碍基因组学研究中的伦理问题:批判性解释性评论。
Hum Genomics. 2021 Mar 12;15(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4.
4
Testing single/combined clinical categories on 5110 Italian patients with developmental phenotypes to improve array-based detection rate.对5110名患有发育表型的意大利患者进行单一/联合临床类别测试,以提高基于阵列的检测率。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Jan;8(1):e1056. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1056. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
A Retrospective Analysis of 10-Year Data Assessed the Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Cytogenomic Abnormalities in Current Prenatal and Pediatric Settings.一项对10年数据的回顾性分析评估了细胞基因组异常在当前产前和儿科环境中的诊断准确性和有效性。
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 20;10:1162. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01162. eCollection 2019.
6
CGH analysis in Colombian patients: findings of 1374 arrays in a seven-year study.哥伦比亚患者的比较基因组杂交分析:一项为期七年的研究中1374次阵列分析的结果
Mol Cytogenet. 2018 Aug 22;11:46. doi: 10.1186/s13039-018-0398-9. eCollection 2018.
7
Derivative chromosomes involving 5p large rearranged segments went unnoticed with the use of conventional cytogenetics.涉及5号染色体大片段重排的衍生染色体在使用传统细胞遗传学方法时未被发现。
Mol Cytogenet. 2018 May 9;11:30. doi: 10.1186/s13039-018-0374-4. eCollection 2018.
8
Efficient and cost-effective genetic analysis of products of conception and fetal tissues using a QF-PCR/array CGH strategy; five years of data.采用QF-PCR/阵列比较基因组杂交策略对妊娠产物和胎儿组织进行高效且经济高效的基因分析;五年数据
Mol Cytogenet. 2017 Apr 5;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13039-017-0313-9. eCollection 2017.
9
Microarray testing in clinical diagnosis: an analysis of 5,300 New Zealand patients.临床诊断中的微阵列检测:对5300名新西兰患者的分析。
Mol Cytogenet. 2016 Mar 31;9:29. doi: 10.1186/s13039-016-0237-9. eCollection 2016.
10
What results to disclose, when, and who decides? Healthcare professionals' views on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis.披露哪些结果、何时披露以及由谁来决定?医疗保健专业人员对产前染色体微阵列分析的看法。
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Mar;36(3):252-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.4772. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Parental insertional balanced translocations are an important cause of apparently de novo CNVs in patients with developmental anomalies.父母插入性平衡易位是导致发育异常患者出现明显新生 CNV 的一个重要原因。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;20(2):166-70. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.157. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
2
The causality of de novo copy number variants is overestimated.新发拷贝数变异的因果关系被高估了。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Nov;19(11):1112-3. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.83. Epub 2011 May 18.
3
Clinical implementation of whole-genome array CGH as a first-tier test in 5080 pre and postnatal cases.全基因组阵列比较基因组杂交技术在5080例产前和产后病例中作为一线检测方法的临床应用。
Mol Cytogenet. 2011 May 9;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-4-12.
4
Unexpected findings in cancer predisposition genes detected by array comparative genomic hybridisation: what are the issues?阵列比较基因组杂交检测到的癌症易感基因的意外发现:存在哪些问题?
J Med Genet. 2011 Aug;48(8):535-9. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.087593. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
5
Detection of mosaicism for genome imbalance in a cohort of 3,042 clinical cases using an oligonucleotide array CGH platform.使用寡核苷酸阵列比较基因组杂交平台在3042例临床病例队列中检测基因组失衡的嵌合体现象。
Eur J Med Genet. 2011 Mar-Apr;54(2):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
6
MLPA for confirmation of array CGH results and determination of inheritance.用于确认阵列比较基因组杂交(array CGH)结果及确定遗传方式的多重连接依赖探针扩增(MLPA)技术
Mol Cytogenet. 2010 Oct 13;3:19. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-3-19.
7
De novo rates and selection of large copy number variation.从头开始的大拷贝数变异的发生率和选择。
Genome Res. 2010 Nov;20(11):1469-81. doi: 10.1101/gr.107680.110. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
8
Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.共识声明:对于患有发育障碍或先天畸形的个体,染色体微阵列是一线临床诊断测试。
Am J Hum Genet. 2010 May 14;86(5):749-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006.
9
Validation and implementation of array comparative genomic hybridisation as a first line test in place of postnatal karyotyping for genome imbalance.验证和实施阵列比较基因组杂交技术作为一线检测方法,以替代出生后核型分析用于检测基因组失衡。
Mol Cytogenet. 2010 Apr 15;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-3-9.
10
Further delineation of the 15q13 microdeletion and duplication syndromes: a clinical spectrum varying from non-pathogenic to a severe outcome.15q13微缺失和微重复综合征的进一步界定:从无致病性到严重后果的临床谱。
J Med Genet. 2009 Aug;46(8):511-23. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.063412. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

作为产后转诊中替代核型分析的一线诊断测试的阵列比较基因组杂交——8700多名患者四年临床应用的结果

Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years' clinical application for over 8,700 patients.

作者信息

Ahn Joo Wook, Bint Susan, Bergbaum Anne, Mann Kathy, Hall Richard P, Ogilvie Caroline Mackie

机构信息

Cytogenetics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT, UK.

出版信息

Mol Cytogenet. 2013 Apr 5;6(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-16.

DOI:10.1186/1755-8166-6-16
PMID:23560982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3632487/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Array CGH is widely used in cytogenetics centres for postnatal constitutional genome analysis, and is now recommended as a first line test in place of G-banded chromosome analysis. At our centre, first line testing by oligonucleotide array CGH for all constitutional referrals for genome imbalance has been in place since June 2008, using a patient vs patient hybridisation strategy to minimise costs.

FINDINGS

Out of a total of 13,412 patients tested with array CGH, 8,794 (66%) had array CGH as the first line test. Referral indications for this first line group ranged from neonatal congenital anomalies through to adult neurodisabilities; 25% of these patients had CNVs either in known pathogenic regions or in other regions where imbalances have not been reported in the normal population. Of these CNVs, 46% were deletions or nullisomy, 53% were duplications or triplications, and mosaic imbalances made up the remainder; 87% were <5Mb and would likely not be detected by G-banded chromosome analysis. For cases with completed inheritance studies, 20% of imbalances were de novo.

CONCLUSIONS

Array CGH is a robust and cost-effective alternative to traditional cytogenetic methodology; it provides a higher diagnostic detection rate than G-banded chromosome analysis, and adds to the sum of information and understanding of the role of genomic imbalance in disease. Use of novel hybridisation strategies can reduce costs, allowing more widespread testing.

摘要

背景

阵列比较基因组杂交(Array CGH)在细胞遗传学中心被广泛用于产后先天性基因组分析,目前被推荐作为替代G带染色体分析的一线检测方法。自2008年6月起,在我们中心,对于所有先天性基因组失衡的转诊病例,均采用寡核苷酸阵列CGH进行一线检测,采用患者与患者杂交策略以降低成本。

研究结果

在总共13412例接受阵列CGH检测的患者中,8794例(66%)将阵列CGH作为一线检测方法。该一线检测组的转诊指征范围从新生儿先天性异常到成人神经残疾;这些患者中有25%在已知致病区域或正常人群中未报告失衡的其他区域存在拷贝数变异(CNV)。在这些CNV中,46%为缺失或单体型,53%为重复或三体型,其余为嵌合失衡;87%小于5Mb,可能无法通过G带染色体分析检测到。对于完成遗传研究的病例,20%的失衡为新发突变。

结论

阵列CGH是传统细胞遗传学方法的一种强大且具有成本效益的替代方法;它比G带染色体分析具有更高的诊断检出率,并增加了有关基因组失衡在疾病中的作用的信息总量和理解。使用新型杂交策略可以降低成本,使检测更广泛地开展。