Donaghue Celia, Davies Nada, Ahn Joo Wook, Thomas Helen, Ogilvie Caroline Mackie, Mann Kathy
Genetics Department, Viapath Analytics, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT UK.
Genetics Department, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 9RT UK.
Mol Cytogenet. 2017 Apr 5;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13039-017-0313-9. eCollection 2017.
Traditional testing of miscarriage products involved culture of tissue followed by G-banded chromosome analysis; this approach has a high failure rate, is labour intensive and has a resolution of around 10 Mb. G-banded chromosome analysis has been replaced by molecular techniques in some laboratories; we previously introduced a QF-PCR/MLPA testing strategy in 2007. To improve diagnostic yield and efficiency we have now updated our testing strategy to a more comprehensive QF-PCR assay followed by array CGH. Here we describe the results from the last 5 years of service.
Fetal tissue samples and products of conception were tested using QF-PCR which will detect aneuploidy for chromosomes 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y. Samples that were normal were then tested by aCGH and all imbalance >1Mb and fully penetrant clinically significant imbalance <1Mb was reported.
QF-PCR analysis identified aneuploidy/triploidy in 25.6% of samples. aCGH analysis detected imbalance in a further 9.6% of samples; this included 1.8% with submicroscopic imbalance and 0.5% of uncertain clinical significance. This approach has a failure rate of 1.4%, compared to 30% for G-banded chromosome analysis.
This efficient QF-PCR/aCGH strategy has a lower failure rate and higher diagnostic yield than karyotype or MLPA strategies; both findings are welcome developments for couples with recurrent miscarriage.
传统的流产产物检测方法是先进行组织培养,然后进行G显带染色体分析;这种方法失败率高、劳动强度大,分辨率约为10Mb。在一些实验室,G显带染色体分析已被分子技术所取代;我们在2007年引入了QF-PCR/MLPA检测策略。为了提高诊断率和效率,我们现在已将检测策略更新为更全面的QF-PCR检测,随后进行阵列比较基因组杂交(array CGH)。在此,我们描述过去5年的服务结果。
使用QF-PCR检测胎儿组织样本和妊娠产物,该方法可检测13、14、15、16、18、21、22、X和Y染色体的非整倍体。正常样本随后进行aCGH检测,报告所有大于1Mb的不平衡以及临床意义明确的小于1Mb的完全显性不平衡。
QF-PCR分析在25.6%的样本中鉴定出非整倍体/三倍体。aCGH分析在另外9.6%的样本中检测到不平衡;这包括1.8%的亚显微不平衡和0.5%临床意义不确定的情况。这种方法的失败率为1.4%,而G显带染色体分析的失败率为30%。
这种高效的QF-PCR/aCGH策略比核型分析或MLPA策略具有更低的失败率和更高的诊断率;对于反复流产的夫妇来说,这两个结果都是令人欣喜的进展。