Analytical Chemistry Division, Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8391, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Analytical Chemistry Division, Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8391, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
Anal Chim Acta. 2013 Apr 22;773:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.02.035. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
The determination of chromium speciation in solid samples is critical for environmental and industrial purposes. Several analytical methods exist to perform such a determination either directly in solid state or liquid state after an extraction step, each of them having some limitations. In this study, the use of a high-resolution wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer to determine and quantify chromium species is investigated by looking at the differences in the Kβ transition profiles between Cr(0), Cr(III) and Cr(VI) compounds. Three different approaches were tested and compared to determine the Cr(VI) fraction of known mixtures: relative height and peak fitting using calibration mixtures, partial least square regression (PLS) of pure compounds, and principal component regression (PCR) of pure compounds. The accuracy of these methods was found to be about the same with an average relative error in the range of 15%. However, PLS and PCR can be easily implemented in an automated way contrary to peak fitting which can be sometimes perceived as analyst-dependant. Another advantage of using PLS and PCR is that information concerning the other oxidation states present in the sample can be retrieved. Finally, PLS and the peak height approach can be used up to 0.5% total chromium which make the XRF an alternative technique to X-ray induced photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for chromium speciation in solid state.
在环境和工业领域,确定固体样品中的铬形态至关重要。目前有几种分析方法可用于直接在固体状态下或在提取步骤后在液体状态下进行此类测定,每种方法都有一些局限性。在这项研究中,通过观察 Cr(0)、Cr(III)和 Cr(VI)化合物之间 Kβ跃迁轮廓的差异,研究了使用高分辨率波长色散 X 射线荧光光谱仪来测定和量化铬形态的方法。测试并比较了三种不同的方法来确定已知混合物中的 Cr(VI)部分:使用校准混合物的相对高度和峰拟合、纯化合物的偏最小二乘回归 (PLS) 和纯化合物的主成分回归 (PCR)。这些方法的准确性大致相同,平均相对误差在 15%范围内。然而,与有时被认为依赖于分析的峰拟合相比,PLS 和 PCR 可以很容易地以自动化方式实现。使用 PLS 和 PCR 的另一个优点是可以检索有关样品中存在的其他氧化态的信息。最后,PLS 和峰高方法可用于总铬含量高达 0.5%的情况,这使得 XRF 成为固态铬形态分析的 X 射线光电子能谱 (XPS) 的替代技术。