Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Govt. Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh 160030, India.
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 May 10;228(1-3):174.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
Forensic anthropologists have proposed different sex determination methods based on metric and non-metric skeletal features of various bones. The main objective of the present investigation was to evaluate sexual dimorphism in human sternum and make comparative analysis based on studies by several workers who used different methodologies and techniques. For this study, 343 sternums were collected and examined from 252 male and 91 female cadavers of a north Indian population. Significant differences were noticed between the mean sternal measurements measured directly on bone specimens in present study and those measured indirectly on radiographs or CT scan images reported by previous researchers. Comparative analysis of absolute sternal measurements showed concordance with some earlier Indian studies but discordance with most other population studies conducted worldwide. Limiting points gave much higher sex accuracy levels than the demarking points. The calculated multivariate DFA equation (y=-14.222+0.076MBL+0.137WS_1) and regression equation (y=36.675-0.198MBL-0.405WS_1) correctly estimated sex of 84.8% and 89.8% sternums, respectively. Multivariate analyses gave more striking results than the univariate ones. Though logistic regression analysis gave higher accuracy rates but discriminant function analysis was found to be a more reliable statistical tool for sex determination because of low sex biases. The sexing efficacies of the dry and wet sternums did not differ significantly, so bone specimens are equally reliable as the radiographs or CT scans for sex determination. The sternal area and the combined length were found the best parameters among all the criteria and methods considered. The changes in the body proportions, nutritional, environmental, climatic changes, etc., are attributable to secular changes in sterna measurements when compared to Jit et al. [13]. The osteometric techniques are better representative of biological identity of the deceased because of some inherent defects associated with radiographic methods. Like other sex-predictive bones of the human skeleton, the sternum can also be a valuable adjunct for sex determination of unknown subjects.
法医人类学家基于不同骨骼的度量和非度量骨骼特征提出了不同的性别鉴定方法。本研究的主要目的是评估人类胸骨的性别二态性,并基于多位研究人员使用不同方法和技术的研究进行比较分析。为此,本研究从北印度人群的 252 名男性和 91 名女性尸体中收集并检查了 343 个胸骨。本研究中直接在骨标本上测量的胸骨测量值与之前研究人员间接在 X 光片或 CT 扫描图像上测量的胸骨测量值存在显著差异。绝对胸骨测量值的比较分析与一些早期的印度研究一致,但与全球大多数其他人群研究不一致。限制点比界定点具有更高的性别准确率。计算出的多元判别分析方程(y=-14.222+0.076MBL+0.137WS_1)和回归方程(y=36.675-0.198MBL-0.405WS_1)分别正确估计了 84.8%和 89.8%的胸骨性别。多元分析比单变量分析得出了更显著的结果。虽然逻辑回归分析给出了更高的准确率,但判别函数分析被发现是一种更可靠的统计工具,因为它的性别偏差较低。干骨和湿骨的性别鉴定效果没有显著差异,因此骨标本与 X 光片或 CT 扫描一样可靠,可用于性别鉴定。在所有考虑的标准和方法中,胸骨面积和联合长度被发现是最佳参数。与 Jit 等人[13]相比,胸骨测量值的变化归因于身体比例、营养、环境、气候等方面的变化。由于与放射学方法相关的一些固有缺陷,骨计量技术更能代表死者的生物特征。与人体骨骼的其他性别预测骨骼一样,胸骨也可以作为未知个体性别鉴定的有用辅助手段。