School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060623. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
Key to successfully negotiating our environment is our ability to adapt to current settings based on recent experiences and behaviour. Response conflict paradigms (e.g., the Stroop task) have provided evidence for increases in executive control after errors, leading to slowed responses that are more likely to be correct, and less susceptible to response congruency effects. Here we investigate whether failures of perceptual awareness, rather than failures at decisional or response stages of information processing, lead to similar adjustments in visual attention. We employed an attentional blink task in which subjects often fail to consciously register the second of two targets embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation stream of distractors, and examined how target errors influence performance on subsequent trials. Performance was inferior after Target 2 errors and these inter-trial effects were independent of the temporal lag between the targets and were not due to more global changes in attention across runs of trials. These results shed light on the nature of attentional calibration in response to failures of perceptual consciousness.
成功应对环境的关键是我们能够根据最近的经验和行为来适应当前的环境。反应冲突范式(例如 Stroop 任务)为错误后执行控制能力的增强提供了证据,导致反应速度减慢,从而更有可能正确,并且对反应一致性效应的敏感性降低。在这里,我们研究了感知意识的失败是否会导致视觉注意力进行类似的调整,而不是在信息处理的决策或反应阶段失败。我们采用了注意瞬脱任务,在该任务中,受试者通常无法有意识地记录快速连续视觉呈现流中两个目标中的第二个目标,并且检查了目标错误如何影响随后试验的性能。在目标 2 错误后,性能下降,这些试验间效应与目标之间的时间滞后无关,并且不是由于整个试验过程中注意力的全局变化所致。这些结果阐明了对感知意识失败做出反应时注意力校准的本质。