• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国和其他国家,基于价值的费用分担可以增加患者对高价值商品和服务的使用。

Value-based cost sharing in the United States and elsewhere can increase patients' use of high-value goods and services.

机构信息

London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):704-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0964.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0964
PMID:23569050
Abstract

This article reviews efforts in the United States and several other member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to encourage patients, through cost sharing, to use goods such as medications, services, and providers that offer better value than other options--an approach known as value-based cost sharing. Among the countries we reviewed, we found that value-based approaches were most commonly applied to drug cost sharing. A few countries, including the United States, employed financial incentives, such as lower copayments, to encourage use of preferred providers or preventive services. Evidence suggests that these efforts can increase patients' use of high-value services--although they may also be associated with high administrative costs and could exacerbate health inequalities among various groups. With careful design, implementation, and evaluation, value-based cost sharing can be an important tool for aligning patient and provider incentives to pursue high-value care.

摘要

本文回顾了美国和经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的其他几个成员国所作的努力,这些国家通过成本共担,鼓励患者使用药品、服务和提供方等,这些产品和服务比其他选择更具价值,这种方法被称为基于价值的成本分担。在我们所审查的国家中,我们发现基于价值的方法最常用于药物成本分担。一些国家,包括美国在内,采用了财务激励措施,如降低共付额,以鼓励使用首选供应商或预防服务。有证据表明,这些努力可以增加患者对高价值服务的使用——尽管它们也可能与高昂的行政成本有关,并可能加剧不同群体之间的健康不平等。通过精心设计、实施和评估,基于价值的成本分担可以成为一种重要工具,用于调整患者和提供者的激励措施,以追求高价值的医疗服务。

相似文献

1
Value-based cost sharing in the United States and elsewhere can increase patients' use of high-value goods and services.在美国和其他国家,基于价值的费用分担可以增加患者对高价值商品和服务的使用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):704-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0964.
2
Value-based insurance design: embracing value over cost alone.基于价值的保险设计:不仅仅关注成本,更要关注价值。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Dec;15(10 Suppl):S277-83.
3
Using clinically nuanced cost sharing to enhance consumer access to specialty medications.运用具有临床细微差别的成本分摊方式,以提高消费者获得专科药物的机会。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Jun 1;20(6):e242-4.
4
Encouraging value-based insurance designs in state health insurance exchanges.鼓励在州健康保险交易所中采用基于价值的保险设计。
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jul;19(7):593-600.
5
Assessing the evidence for value-based insurance design.评估基于价值的保险设计的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):1988-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0324.
6
Introduction to value-based insurance design.基于价值的保险设计简介。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Nov;5(11):1118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.06.014.
7
Applying value-based insurance design to high-cost health services.将基于价值的保险设计应用于高成本医疗服务。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Nov;29(11):2009-16. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0469.
8
State insurance exchanges face challenges in offering standardized choices alongside innovative value-based insurance.国家保险交易所面临着在提供标准化选择的同时提供创新的基于价值的保险的挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):418-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1072.
9
Value-based insurance design: aligning incentives to bridge the divide between quality improvement and cost containment.基于价值的保险设计:调整激励措施以弥合质量提升与成本控制之间的差距。
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Dec;12 Spec no.:SP5-SP10.
10
Value, not just costs, need to be considered for quality managed care.对于质量管理型医疗服务,不仅要考虑成本,还需要考虑价值。
Bus Health. 1987 Apr;4(6):64.

引用本文的文献

1
The Shadow Price of Uncertainty: Consequences of Unpredictable Insurance Coverage for Access, Care, and Financial Security.不确定性的影子价格:不可预测的保险覆盖范围对医疗可及性、医疗服务和财务安全的影响。
Milbank Q. 2025 Jun;103(2):440-479. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.70006. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Clustering affordable care act qualified health plans to understand how and where insurance facilitates or impedes access to HIV prevention.将平价医疗法案合格健康计划进行聚类,以了解保险如何以及在何处促进或阻碍艾滋病毒预防。
AIDS Res Ther. 2024 Nov 19;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12981-024-00674-9.
3
Association of Participation in a Value-Based Insurance Design Program With Health Care Spending and Utilization.
参与基于价值的保险设计计划与医疗保健支出和利用的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232666. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2666.
4
Disparities in adoption of new diabetic therapies with cardiovascular benefits.新的糖尿病治疗方法在心血管获益方面的采用存在差异。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;196:110233. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110233. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Reasons for (not) choosing dental treatments-A qualitative study based on patients' perspective.(不)选择牙科治疗的原因 - 基于患者观点的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0267656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267656. eCollection 2022.
6
Strategies to Reduce Low-Value Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.降低低价值心血管护理的策略:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000105. doi: 10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000105. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Branded prescription drug spending: a framework to evaluate policy options.品牌处方药支出:评估政策选项的框架
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Oct 2;10:31. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0115-9. eCollection 2017.
8
Impact of Out-of-Pocket Costs on Prescription Fills Among New Initiators of Biologic Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis.生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎新使用者自付费用对处方配药的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Feb;22(2):122-30. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.14261. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Can European Countries Improve Sustainability of Health Care Financing through Patient Cost-Sharing?欧洲国家能否通过患者费用分担来提高医疗保健融资的可持续性?
Front Public Health. 2015 Aug 12;3:196. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00196. eCollection 2015.
10
Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.基于价值的支付改革中区域和州创新的新经验教训:平衡协作与颠覆性创新。
Milbank Q. 2014 Sep;92(3):568-623. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12078.