Suppr超能文献

儿童 1 型糖尿病的自我管理模式可预测 2 年后的血糖控制水平。

Patterns of self-management in pediatric type 1 diabetes predict level of glycemic control 2 years later.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.

出版信息

J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Apr;34(3):186-96. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318287cb48.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if 3 distinct self-management patterns (i.e., maladaptive, moderate/mixed, and adaptive) observed at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years in a sample of youth with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers predicted mean differences in adolescent's subsequent glycemic control.

METHODS

This study is a descriptive, multisite, prospective study that examined a sample of youth diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (ages 9-11 years at baseline). Youth and their maternal and paternal caregivers provided information about the youth's self-management patterns at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years using the Diabetes Self-Management Profile structured interview. Glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c: HbA1c) was examined at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

RESULTS

Three distinct self-management patterns were observed at 1 year and 2 years, which were conceptually consistent with previously reported baseline self-management patterns. Youth identified by their maternal caregivers as having adaptive self-management patterns at baseline had better glycemic control across 2 years compared with those in the maladaptive and mixed self-management groups. Similarly, maternal reports suggested that youth with less adaptive self-management patterns generally had worse glycemic control over time and HbA1c values above the American Diabetes Association recommendations. Youth and paternal caregiver reports yielded more variable findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings underscore the stability of self-management patterns in pediatric type 1 diabetes and the need for preventive interventions that are tailored to specific patterns of self-management associated with risk for problematic glycemic control.

摘要

目的

确定在一个患有 1 型糖尿病的青少年及其照顾者样本中,基线、1 年和 2 年时观察到的 3 种不同的自我管理模式(即适应不良型、中等/混合型和适应型)是否可以预测青少年随后的血糖控制的平均差异。

方法

本研究为描述性、多地点、前瞻性研究,对一组确诊患有 1 型糖尿病的青少年(基线时年龄为 9-11 岁)进行了研究。青少年及其母亲和父亲照顾者使用糖尿病自我管理概况结构化访谈,在基线、1 年和 2 年时提供有关青少年自我管理模式的信息。在基线和 6、12、18 和 24 个月时检查血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白:HbA1c)。

结果

在 1 年和 2 年时观察到 3 种不同的自我管理模式,这些模式与之前报告的基线自我管理模式概念上一致。在基线时被母亲照顾者认定为具有适应性自我管理模式的青少年在 2 年内的血糖控制情况更好,而在适应不良和混合自我管理组的青少年则较差。同样,母亲的报告表明,自我管理模式不太适应的青少年的血糖控制通常随着时间的推移而恶化,HbA1c 值高于美国糖尿病协会的建议。青少年和父亲照顾者的报告得出的结果则更为多样。

结论

研究结果强调了儿科 1 型糖尿病自我管理模式的稳定性,以及需要针对与血糖控制问题风险相关的特定自我管理模式进行定制的预防干预措施。

相似文献

1
Patterns of self-management in pediatric type 1 diabetes predict level of glycemic control 2 years later.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Apr;34(3):186-96. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318287cb48.
2
Identification of self-management patterns in pediatric type 1 diabetes using cluster analysis.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Nov;12(7):611-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00752.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
3
Identification and prediction of group-based glycemic control trajectories during the transition to adolescence.
Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;33(10):1143-52. doi: 10.1037/hea0000025. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
Diabetes management and glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes: test of a predictive model.
J Behav Med. 2013 Jun;36(3):234-45. doi: 10.1007/s10865-012-9426-0. Epub 2012 May 9.
6
Diabetes conflict outstrips the positive impact of self-efficacy on youth adherence and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2017 Nov;18(7):614-618. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12471. Epub 2016 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Psychosocial Acuity and Glycemic Control in a Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Clinic.
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2024 Apr;50(2):116-129. doi: 10.1177/26350106241232634. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Mediterranean diet adherence and glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jan;183(1):453-460. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05325-1. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
Psychological Considerations in Pediatric Chronic Illness: Case Examples.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 3;17(5):1644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051644.
6
Autonomy support and responsibility-sharing predict blood glucose monitoring frequency among youth with diabetes.
Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;33(10):1224-31. doi: 10.1037/hea0000034. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
7
Identification and prediction of group-based glycemic control trajectories during the transition to adolescence.
Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;33(10):1143-52. doi: 10.1037/hea0000025. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-management of Type 1 Diabetes Across Adolescence.
Diabetes Educ. 2011 Jul-Aug;37(4):486-500. doi: 10.1177/0145721711406140. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Identification of self-management patterns in pediatric type 1 diabetes using cluster analysis.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Nov;12(7):611-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00752.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
3
Blood glucose monitoring and glycemic control in adolescence: contribution of diabetes-specific responsibility and family conflict.
J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug;47(2):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.01.012. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
5
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
6
Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis.
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):e1171-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0207. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
7
Parenting, autonomy and self-care of adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Jan;35(1):79-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00892.x.
8
The use of cluster analytic techniques in developmental and behavioral pediatric research.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007 Aug;28(4):327-9. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181132008.
10
Identification of distinct self-management styles of adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1107-12. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2197. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验