Issa Kimona, Rifai Aiman, McGrath Mike S, Callaghan John J, Wright Craig, Malkani Arthur L, Mont Michael A, McInerney Vincent K
Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Knee Surg. 2013 Dec;26(6):429-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343615. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) may allow for reliable alignment and fewer outliers when compared with conventionally instrumented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, some authors have suggested that frequent intraoperative surgeon-directed changes may still be required. This study evaluated the accuracy of PSI to predict component sizing and alignment during TKA. A total of 84 patients (89 knees) who underwent a TKA using a PSI system were evaluated. An MRI-based preoperative plan of every knee was provided and approved by the surgeons. This demonstrated the proposed prosthetic component alignment, as well as the femoral, tibial, and bearing insert component size and position. Intraoperative changes to these components were prospectively recorded and compared with the computerized preoperative plan. Major changes were defined as any changes in femoral or tibial resection, size, and position of the components. Minor changes were defined as any change in the size of the polyethylene bearing insert. The preoperative plan was able to correctly predict the size of the implanted tibial and femoral component in 93 and 95.5% of the cases, respectively. Thirteen major intraoperative changes were made. In one knee, the proposed femoral resection was not acceptable (because of the presence of significant amount of osteophytes) and was abandoned in favor of a manual extramedullary guide. In another patient, the proposed femoral and tibial components were upsized. In two other patients, the femoral components were downsized, in four patients, the tibial components were downsized, and in another patient, it was upsized. There were also 16 minor changes, which included 2-mm upsizing of the polyethylene liner in 13 knees and 4-mm upsizing in 3 knees. Surgical experience is necessary to recognize improper component size, incorrect surgical resection, or nonideal alignment when performing TKA using PSI. The authors believe that the design and manufacture of PSI combined with a comprehensive templating resulted in excellent intraoperative concordance of the preoperative plan at the default settings with minimal changes.
与传统器械辅助全膝关节置换术(TKA)相比,基于磁共振成像(MRI)或计算机断层扫描的患者特异性器械(PSI)可能实现更可靠的对线且异常值更少。然而,一些作者认为术中仍可能需要频繁的术者指导下的调整。本研究评估了PSI在TKA期间预测假体组件尺寸和对线的准确性。共评估了84例(89膝)使用PSI系统进行TKA的患者。为每个膝关节提供了基于MRI的术前计划并经外科医生批准。这展示了建议的假体组件对线,以及股骨、胫骨和衬垫组件的尺寸和位置。前瞻性记录这些组件的术中变化并与计算机化的术前计划进行比较。重大变化定义为股骨或胫骨截骨、组件尺寸和位置的任何变化。微小变化定义为聚乙烯衬垫尺寸的任何变化。术前计划分别在93%和95.5%的病例中正确预测了植入的胫骨和股骨组件的尺寸。术中进行了13处重大调整。在1例膝关节中,建议的股骨截骨不可接受(由于存在大量骨赘),因此放弃并采用手动髓外导向器。在另1例患者中,建议的股骨和胫骨组件尺寸增大。在另外2例患者中,股骨组件尺寸减小,在4例患者中,胫骨组件尺寸减小,在另1例患者中,胫骨组件尺寸增大。还有16处微小变化,包括13膝的聚乙烯衬垫增厚2 mm和3膝的增厚4 mm。在使用PSI进行TKA时,需要手术经验来识别组件尺寸不当、手术截骨不正确或对线不理想的情况。作者认为,PSI的设计和制造与全面的模板相结合,在默认设置下实现了术前计划与术中的高度一致性,且变化最小。