Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Nov;26(11):3317-3324. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4876-8. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may improve component sizing. Little has been reported about accuracy of the default plan created by the manufacturer, especially for CT-based PSI. The goal of this study was to evaluate the reliability of this plan and the impact of the surgeon's changes on the final accuracy of the guide sizes.
Forty-five patients eligible for primary TKA were prospectively enrolled. The planned implant sizes were prospectively recorded from the initial manufacturer's proposal and from the final plan adjusted in light of the surgeon's evaluation; these two sizes where then compared to the actually implanted sizes. Fisher's exact test was used to test differences for categorical variables. Agreement between pre-operative plans and final implant was evaluated with the Bland-Altman method.
The manufacturer's proposal differed from the final implant in 9 (20.0%) femoral and 23 (51.1%) tibial components, while the surgeon's plan in 6 (13.3%, femoral) and 12 (26.7%, tibial). Modifications in the pre-operative plan were carried out for five (11.1%) femoral and 23 (51.1%) tibial components (p = 0.03). Appropriate modification occurred in 22 (88.0%) and 19 (76.0%) cases of femoral and tibial changes. The agreement between the manufacturer's and the surgeon's pre-operative plans was poor, especially with regard to tibial components.
The surgeon's accuracy in predicting the final component size was significantly different from that of the manufacturer and changes in the initial manufacturer's plan were necessary to get an accurate pre-operative plan of the implant sizes.
Careful evaluation of the initial manufacturer's plan by an experienced knee surgeon is mandatory when planning TKA with CT-based PSI.
II.
膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者特定仪器(PSI)可改善组件尺寸。关于制造商创建的默认计划的准确性,特别是基于 CT 的 PSI,报道甚少。本研究的目的是评估该计划的可靠性以及外科医生的更改对导板尺寸最终准确性的影响。
前瞻性纳入 45 例符合初次 TKA 条件的患者。前瞻性记录初始制造商建议和根据外科医生评估调整后的最终计划中的计划植入物尺寸;然后将这两个尺寸与实际植入的尺寸进行比较。使用 Fisher 精确检验对分类变量进行差异检验。使用 Bland-Altman 方法评估术前计划与最终植入物之间的一致性。
制造商的建议与 9 例(20.0%)股骨和 23 例(51.1%)胫骨组件的最终植入物不同,而外科医生的计划与 6 例(13.3%,股骨)和 12 例(26.7%,胫骨)的最终植入物不同。术前计划的修改是针对 5 例(11.1%)股骨和 23 例(51.1%)胫骨组件进行的(p=0.03)。在 22 例(88.0%)和 19 例(76.0%)股骨和胫骨变化中进行了适当的修改。制造商和外科医生术前计划之间的一致性较差,尤其是胫骨组件。
外科医生预测最终组件尺寸的准确性与制造商明显不同,并且需要对初始制造商计划进行更改,以获得准确的术前植入物尺寸计划。
在使用基于 CT 的 PSI 进行 TKA 规划时,经验丰富的膝关节外科医生必须仔细评估初始制造商的计划。
II 级。