Suppr超能文献

药物治疗法庭对康复的影响:一项系统综述。

The impact of drug treatment courts on recovery: a systematic review.

作者信息

Wittouck Ciska, Dekkers Anne, De Ruyver Brice, Vanderplasschen Wouter, Vander Laenen Freya

机构信息

Department of Penal Law and Criminology, Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy (IRCP), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:493679. doi: 10.1155/2013/493679. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Earlier reviews regarding the effectiveness of Drug Treatment Courts (DTCs) reported a reduction in reoffending and substance use. Although substance users suffer from other difficulties than drug use and judicial issues, none of these reviews focused on outcomes or effects of DTCs on drug-related life domains, such as social relationships, employment, or health. Therefor, the present paper aims to review the impact of adult DTCs on substance use and drug-related life domains.

METHOD

Primary studies were systematically searched in Web of Knowledge. Observational and controlled evaluation studies of adult DTCs were considered eligible if substance use and/or drug-related life domains were measured.

RESULTS

Moderately positive results were found with respect to within-program substance use. Few studies used drug-related life domains as an outcome measure and most of them yielded no effects. Employment and family relations ameliorated when specific interventions were used.

DISCUSSION

DTCs yield beneficial outcomes and effects regarding within-program substance use. However, evidence regarding the impact of DTCs on post-program drug and alcohol use and on other drug-related life domains is scarce. These life domains and thus QoL possibly can be improved by DTCs if specifically targeted. Future research is warranted.

摘要

引言

早期关于毒品治疗法庭(DTCs)有效性的综述报告称,再犯率和药物使用有所降低。尽管吸毒者除了药物使用和司法问题外还面临其他困难,但这些综述均未关注DTCs对与毒品相关的生活领域(如社会关系、就业或健康)的结果或影响。因此,本文旨在综述成人DTCs对药物使用和与毒品相关的生活领域的影响。

方法

在《科学引文索引》中系统检索了原始研究。如果对药物使用和/或与毒品相关的生活领域进行了测量,则成人DTCs的观察性和对照评估研究被视为符合条件。

结果

在项目内药物使用方面发现了适度的积极结果。很少有研究将与毒品相关的生活领域作为结果指标,而且大多数研究没有产生效果。当采用特定干预措施时,就业和家庭关系得到改善。

讨论

DTCs在项目内药物使用方面产生了有益的结果和影响。然而,关于DTCs对项目后药物和酒精使用以及对其他与毒品相关的生活领域影响的证据很少。如果有针对性,这些生活领域以及生活质量可能会通过DTCs得到改善。未来的研究是必要的。

相似文献

1
The impact of drug treatment courts on recovery: a systematic review.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:493679. doi: 10.1155/2013/493679. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

引用本文的文献

2
Effectiveness of substance use disorder treatment as an alternative to imprisonment.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 9;24(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05734-y.
3
Motivation and accessing care among drug treatment court involved women: A sequential, mixed-methods approach.
J Community Psychol. 2024 Jan;52(1):105-133. doi: 10.1002/jcop.23088. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
4
PROTOCOL: Family treatment drug courts for improving parental legal and psychosocial outcomes.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 14;15(1-2):e1024. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1024. eCollection 2019 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome Trajectories in Drug Court: Do All Participants Have Drug Problems?
Crim Justice Behav. 2009 Apr;36(4):354-368. doi: 10.1177/0093854809331547.
2
Effects of major depression on crack use and arrests among women in drug court.
Addiction. 2011 Jul;106(7):1279-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03389.x. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
3
Problem-solving courts in Canada: A review and a call for empirically-based evaluation methods.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;33(4):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.008.
4
Systematic review of the impact of adult drug-treatment courts.
Transl Res. 2010 Jun;155(6):263-74. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
5
A randomized pilot study of the Engaging Moms Program for family drug court.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Apr;38(3):263-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
6
Adaptive interventions may optimize outcomes in drug courts: a pilot study.
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2009 Oct;11(5):370-6. doi: 10.1007/s11920-009-0056-3.
7
What are your priorities right now? Identifying service needs across recovery stages to inform service development.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jan;38(1):51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
9
Breaking the habit: a retrospective analysis of desistance factors among formerly problematic heroin users.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 Nov;27(6):619-24. doi: 10.1080/09595230802392808.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验