Gun Eryilmaz Ozlem, Dogan Nasuh Utku, Gulerman Cavidan, Mollamahmutoglu Leyla, Cicek Nedim, Deveer Ruya
Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Education and Research Hospital, 62000 Ankara, Turkey.
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:196709. doi: 10.1155/2013/196709. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
Objectives. Hospital fear and avoidance of the routine hospital obstetrical interventions cause some women with low-risk pregnancies to spend most of the active labor period at home, and subsequently they present to the hospital for delivery. Our aim was to analyze the maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with a planned hospital birth, yet spending the first stage of labor at home without a health provider and completing the delivery in the hospital setting. Methods. We retrospectively compared 238 pregnancies having home labor plus hospital delivery (study group) with 476 pregnancies that had spent the whole labor in the hospital setting, considering various maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results. Cesarean and episiotomy rates were lower (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, resp.), but neonatal intensive care unit admissions of the infants were more prevalent (P < 0.01) in the study group. Other maternal and neonatal outcomes including neonatal mortality were comparable. Conclusion. Although our preliminary data generally do support the safety of home active labor plus hospital delivery for low-risk pregnancies, the clinical implications of current data warrant further prospective trials.
目的。对常规医院产科干预措施的恐惧和回避,导致一些低风险妊娠女性在活跃分娩期的大部分时间都在家中度过,随后才前往医院分娩。我们的目的是分析计划在医院分娩,但在没有医护人员陪伴的情况下在家中度过第一产程并在医院完成分娩的妊娠的母婴结局。方法。我们回顾性比较了238例在家分娩加在医院分娩的妊娠(研究组)和476例在医院全程分娩的妊娠,考虑了各种母婴结局。结果。研究组的剖宫产率和会阴切开率较低(分别为P < 0.0001和P < 0.001),但婴儿入住新生儿重症监护病房的情况更为普遍(P < 0.01)。包括新生儿死亡率在内的其他母婴结局具有可比性。结论。尽管我们的初步数据总体上确实支持低风险妊娠在家中活跃分娩加在医院分娩的安全性,但当前数据的临床意义值得进一步进行前瞻性试验。