Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗后行颈动脉内膜切除术

Carotid endarterectomy following thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.

作者信息

Ahmed Naz, Kelleher Damian, Madan Manmohan, Sochart Sarita, Antoniou George A

机构信息

1 Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The Royal Oldham Hospital, Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

a Royal Oldham Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vasa. 2017 Mar;46(2):116-120. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000601. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insufficient evidence exists to support the safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) following intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischaemic stroke. Our study aimed to report a single-centre experience of patients treated over a five-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Departmental computerised databases were interrogated to identify patients who suffered an ischaemic stroke and subsequently underwent thrombolysis followed by CEA. Mortality and stroke within 30 days of surgery were defined as the primary outcome end points.

RESULTS

Over a five-year period, 177 out of a total of 679 carotid endarterectomies (26 %) were performed in patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke. Twenty-five patients (14 %) received IVT prior to CEA in the form of alteplase. Sixty percent of patients were male with a mean age of 68 years. Sixteen patients (64 %) underwent CEA within 14 days of IVT and the median interval between thrombolysis and CEA was 7.5 days (range, 3-50 days). One female patient died of a further intraoperative stroke within 30 days of surgery, yielding a mortality rate of 4 %. Two patients (8 %) suffered from cardiac complications postoperatively resulting in a short high dependency unit stay. Another two patients (8 %) developed local wound complications, which were managed conservatively without the need for re-operation. The median hospital length of stay was 4.5 days (range, 1-33 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience indicates that CEA post-thrombolysis has a low incidence of mortality. Further high quality evidence is required before CEA can be routinely recommended following IVT for acute ischaemic stroke.

摘要

背景

对于急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓(IVT)后行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的安全性,目前尚无充分证据支持。我们的研究旨在报告一个中心五年期间治疗此类患者的经验。

患者与方法

查询科室计算机数据库,以识别发生缺血性卒中、随后接受溶栓治疗并继而接受CEA的患者。将手术30天内的死亡率和卒中定义为主要结局终点。

结果

在五年期间,679例颈动脉内膜切除术中,有177例(26%)是在急性缺血性卒中患者中进行的。25例患者(14%)在CEA之前接受了阿替普酶形式的IVT。60%的患者为男性,平均年龄68岁。16例患者(64%)在IVT后14天内接受了CEA,溶栓与CEA之间的中位间隔时间为7.5天(范围3 - 50天)。1例女性患者在手术后30天内因再次发生术中卒中死亡,死亡率为4%。2例患者(8%)术后出现心脏并发症,导致在高依赖病房短期住院。另外2例患者(8%)出现局部伤口并发症,经保守治疗无需再次手术。中位住院时间为4.5天(范围1 - 33天)。

结论

我们的经验表明,溶栓后行CEA死亡率较低。在急性缺血性卒中IVT后常规推荐CEA之前,还需要更多高质量证据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验