• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性筋膜闭合与分期闭合联合腹壁下间隙隔离在腹裂患儿中的应用:一项荟萃分析。

Primary fascial closure versus staged closure with silo in patients with gastroschisis: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Apr;48(4):845-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.020
PMID:23583145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4103994/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Gastroschisis is the most common congenital abdominal wall defect. Despite advances in the surgical closure of gastroschisis, consensus is lacking as to which method results in the best patient outcomes. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare short-term outcomes associated with primary fascial closure and staged repair with a silo in patients with gastroschisis.

METHODS

We reviewed Medline citations, as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, between January 1, 1996 and June 1, 2012. Articles were identified using the search term "gastroschisis" and [("treatment outcome" or "prognosis") or randomized controlled trials]. Case reports, reviews, letters, abstracts only, non-English abstracts, and studies that did not address at least one of the outcomes of interest were excluded from the meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers identified relevant articles for final inclusion. A standard data collection form created by the authors was used to extract study information, including study design, patient characteristics, and reported patient outcomes. The data were analyzed using standard meta-analytic techniques.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the five studies that selected closure method randomly or as a temporal shift in practice, silo was associated with better outcomes, with a significant reduction in ventilator days (p<0.0001), time to first feed (p=0.04), and infection rates (p=0.03). When all studies were included, primary closure was associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Silo closure is associated with better clinical outcomes in the studies with the least selection bias. Larger prospective studies are needed to definitively determine the best closure technique.

摘要

背景/目的:先天性腹壁缺损中,腹裂最为常见。尽管在先天性腹壁缺损的手术修复方面取得了进步,但对于哪种方法能获得最佳的患者预后,目前仍缺乏共识。本荟萃分析的目的在于比较原发性筋膜闭合术与使用造口袋分期修复术治疗先天性腹壁缺损的短期疗效。

方法

我们检索了 1996 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 6 月 1 日期间的 Medline 文献,并查阅了 Cochrane 系统评价数据库。使用的检索词为“gastroschisis”和[(“治疗结果”或“预后”)或随机对照试验]。排除了病例报告、综述、信件、仅摘要、非英文摘要以及未涉及至少一个感兴趣结局的研究。两名独立的审查员确定了最终纳入的相关文章。作者制定了一个标准的数据采集表,用于提取研究信息,包括研究设计、患者特征和报告的患者结局。使用标准的荟萃分析技术对数据进行分析。

结果

共有 20 项研究纳入荟萃分析。在 5 项随机选择或按时间顺序选择闭合方法的研究中,使用造口袋的患者结局更好,呼吸机使用天数显著减少(p<0.0001)、首次喂养时间提前(p=0.04)、感染率降低(p=0.03)。当纳入所有研究时,原发性闭合术与更好的结局相关。

结论

在选择偏倚最小的研究中,使用造口袋的闭合术与更好的临床结局相关。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来明确哪种闭合技术最好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2c6/4103994/6ce4e9a9cf53/nihms510119f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2c6/4103994/4644d4e0a957/nihms510119f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2c6/4103994/90b7ae4bfb8f/nihms510119f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2c6/4103994/6ce4e9a9cf53/nihms510119f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2c6/4103994/4644d4e0a957/nihms510119f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2c6/4103994/90b7ae4bfb8f/nihms510119f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2c6/4103994/6ce4e9a9cf53/nihms510119f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary fascial closure versus staged closure with silo in patients with gastroschisis: a meta-analysis.原发性筋膜闭合与分期闭合联合腹壁下间隙隔离在腹裂患儿中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Apr;48(4):845-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.020.
2
Method to our madness: an 18-year retrospective analysis on gastroschisis closure.疯狂背后的方法:18 年回顾性分析先天性腹裂的关闭方法。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Mar;45(3):579-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.08.004.
3
No free ride? The hidden costs of delayed operative management using a spring-loaded silo for gastroschisis.无免费午餐?使用弹筒式集尿袋治疗腹裂时延迟手术治疗的隐性代价。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jul;45(7):1426-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.047.
4
Primary fascial closure in 112 infants with gastroschisis.112例腹裂婴儿的一期筋膜闭合术
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Apr;88(4):492-7.
5
The use of a spring-loaded silo for gastroschisis: impact on practice patterns and outcomes.弹簧加载式腹腔闭合器用于腹裂修补术:对实践模式和治疗结果的影响
Arch Surg. 2009 Jun;144(6):516-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.63.
6
Use of composite mesh in gastroschisis: A unique approach.复合补片在腹裂修补术中的应用:一种独特的方法。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;12(2):148-51. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.160410.
7
Outcomes of plastic closure in gastroschisis.先天性脐膨出的整形修复术治疗效果。
Surgery. 2011 Aug;150(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
8
Experience of bedside preformed silo staged reduction and closure for gastroschisis.先天性腹裂床边预制袋分期还纳与闭合的经验
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Nov;41(11):1830-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.06.048.
9
Outcomes of sutureless gastroschisis closure.无缝合修补腹裂的结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1947-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.027.
10
Flap versus fascial closure for gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹裂修补术中皮瓣与筋膜闭合术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 May;51(5):718-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Survival of Newborns with Gastroschisis from a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital in India.印度一家三级护理儿童医院中影响腹裂新生儿存活的因素。
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jul-Aug;30(4):491-496. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_21_25. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
Early versus delayed silo closure in gastroschisis: a retrospective study.先天性腹裂早期与延迟关闭腹腔:一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 May 18;41(1):138. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06042-6.
3
The outcomes of treatment between primary closure and staged closure in gastroschisis in the pre and post era of the bedside wound retractor silo placement technique.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term review of sutureless ward reduction in neonates with gastroschisis in the neonatal unit.新生儿外科病房中应用无缝线关腹技术治疗新生儿先天性腹壁缺损的长期回顾性研究
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug;47(8):1516-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.010.
2
The jury is still out: changes in gastroschisis management over the last decade are associated with both benefits and shortcomings.尚无定论:过去十年中,先天性脐膨出的管理方式发生了变化,这既有好处也有缺点。
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jan;47(1):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.10.029.
3
Gastroschisis: one year outcomes from national cohort study.
床边伤口牵开器袋状安置技术应用前后,腹裂患儿一期缝合与分期缝合的治疗效果。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jan 7;41(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05940-5.
4
Predictors of outcomes in infants with gastroschisis treated with a preformed silo.使用预制袋治疗的腹裂婴儿预后的预测因素。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Dec 5;41(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05922-7.
5
Evaluation of the Management of Gastroschisis in Aristide Le Dantec University Hospital Center in Dakar: A Cross Sectional Study.达喀尔阿利斯特德·勒丹泰克大学教学医院中心腹裂管理评估:一项横断面研究。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2024 Jul 1;21(3):155-159. doi: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_68_22. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
6
Case Report: foetal gastroschisis with ideal pregnancy outcomes under multidisciplinary treatment management.病例报告:多学科治疗管理下胎儿腹裂并获得理想妊娠结局
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 28;12:1358856. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1358856. eCollection 2024.
7
Gastroschisis in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of the prevalence, management practices, and associated outcomes.撒哈拉以南非洲的腹裂:患病率、管理实践和相关结局的范围综述。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Aug 16;39(1):246. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05531-w.
8
Therapeutic Hypothermia Treatment for an Infant with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy and Gastroschisis: A Case Report.治疗性低温治疗缺氧缺血性脑病合并腹裂畸形婴儿:一例报告
AJP Rep. 2023 Mar 15;13(1):e17-e20. doi: 10.1055/a-2028-7890. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
Improved Mortality of Patients with Gastroschisis: A Historical Literature Review of Advances in Surgery and Critical Care from 1960-2020.先天性腹裂患者死亡率的改善:1960 - 2020年外科手术及重症监护进展的历史文献综述
Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;9(10):1504. doi: 10.3390/children9101504.
10
Predictors of length of stay for simple gastroschisis: analysis of ACS NSQIP-P database.单纯性先天性胃壁膨出住院时间的预测因素:ACS NSQIP-P 数据库分析。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Oct;38(10):1371-1376. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05189-w. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
先天性腹裂:全国队列研究的一年随访结果。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 15;343:d6749. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6749.
4
Variability in gastroschisis management: a survey of North American pediatric surgery training programs.先天性腹裂畸形管理中的变异性:对北美小儿外科学培训项目的调查。
J Surg Res. 2012 Jul;176(1):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
5
Does staged closure have a worse prognosis in gastroschisis?分期关腹术会使腹裂预后更差吗?
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(4):563-6. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000400007.
6
Neonatal abdominal wall defects.新生儿腹壁缺陷。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Jun;16(3):164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
7
Review of the evidence on the closure of abdominal wall defects.腹壁缺损闭合相关证据综述。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2011 Apr;27(4):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2803-2. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
8
Clinical features of newborns with gastroschisis and outcomes of different initial interventions: primary closure versus staged repair.先天性腹壁裂新生儿的临床特征及不同初始干预措施的结局:一期关闭与分期修复。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2010 Dec;51(6):320-5. doi: 10.1016/S1875-9572(10)60062-9.
9
Outcome differences between gastroschisis repair methods.先天性腹裂修补方法的结果差异。
J Surg Res. 2011 Jan;165(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.054. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
10
Gastroschisis: a national cohort study to describe contemporary surgical strategies and outcomes.先天性腹裂:一项全国性队列研究,旨在描述当代的手术策略和结局。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Sep;45(9):1808-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.01.036.