• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先天性腹壁裂新生儿的临床特征及不同初始干预措施的结局:一期关闭与分期修复。

Clinical features of newborns with gastroschisis and outcomes of different initial interventions: primary closure versus staged repair.

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.

出版信息

Pediatr Neonatol. 2010 Dec;51(6):320-5. doi: 10.1016/S1875-9572(10)60062-9.

DOI:10.1016/S1875-9572(10)60062-9
PMID:21146795
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastroschisis requires surgical management soon after birth. Few publications have reached conclusion regarding the differences of outcomes between primary closure (PC) and a staged repair with silo pouch reduction (SR); as the initial management of gastroschisis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted in 44 newborns with gastroschisis between 1996 and 2007 at Chang Gung Children's Hospital. We recorded and analyzed basic demographic data, including birth body weight, gestational age, size of the wall defect, initial operative procedure, outcomes, and mortality.

RESULTS

The male-to-female ratio was 21:23. Patients had a low birth body weight (2263 ± 539g, mean ± SD) and were borderline premature (gestational age = 36.3 ± 1.86 weeks). Thirty-two patients received PC and 12 received SR as the initial treatment. Seven of the newborn infants died because of delayed initial surgical intervention (n = 2), operation-related complications (n = 4), or underlying multiple congenital anomalies (n = 1). The mortality rate was 16%. When comparing PC and SR (excluding "complicated" gastroschisis), there were no significant differences in survival, days of ventilator use, days to reach full enteral feeding, and hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

PC and SR are comparable as initial treatment modalities for gastroschisis. In addition to underlying gastrointestinal anomalies, the factors that led to significant morbidity in our study were bowel gangrene or perforation resulting from postponed surgical management and the development of abdominal compartment syndrome.

摘要

背景

先天性腹壁发育不全(gastroschisis)患儿出生后需立即接受外科治疗。目前仅有少数文献报道了一期直接缝合(primary closure,PC)与分期经皮硅胶膜袋法减张术(silo pouch reduction,SR)治疗先天性腹壁发育不全的临床结局差异。

方法

回顾性分析 1996 年至 2007 年在我院出生的 44 例先天性腹壁发育不全患儿的临床资料,包括患儿的基本人口统计学数据(出生体质量、胎龄、腹壁缺损大小、初始手术方式、转归及病死率)。

结果

男/女患儿比例为 21:23。患儿出生体质量低(2263 ± 539g),且胎龄接近早产(36.3 ± 1.86 周)。32 例患儿接受一期直接缝合,12 例患儿接受分期经皮硅胶膜袋法减张术治疗。7 例患儿因初次手术延误(2 例)、术后并发症(4 例)或合并多发先天畸形(1 例)死亡,病死率为 16%。排除“复杂型”先天性腹壁发育不全后,一期直接缝合与分期经皮硅胶膜袋法减张术治疗先天性腹壁发育不全的患儿在存活率、呼吸机使用时间、达到完全肠内喂养时间及住院时间等方面差异无统计学意义。

结论

一期直接缝合与分期经皮硅胶膜袋法减张术治疗先天性腹壁发育不全的疗效相当。除了存在胃肠道畸形外,导致患儿严重并发症的原因还包括延迟手术治疗导致的肠管坏死穿孔和腹腔间隔室综合征的发生。

相似文献

1
Clinical features of newborns with gastroschisis and outcomes of different initial interventions: primary closure versus staged repair.先天性腹壁裂新生儿的临床特征及不同初始干预措施的结局:一期关闭与分期修复。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2010 Dec;51(6):320-5. doi: 10.1016/S1875-9572(10)60062-9.
2
Outcome of gastroschisis: a 20-year case review of infants with gastroschisis born in Galveston, Texas.腹裂的结局:对在得克萨斯州加尔维斯顿出生的腹裂婴儿的20年病例回顾
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Jun;41(6):1103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.02.008.
3
Gastroschisis: a plea for risk categorization.腹裂:关于风险分类的呼吁。
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Jan;36(1):51-5. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20004.
4
Secondary plastic closure of gastroschisis is associated with a lower incidence of mechanical ventilation.腹裂的二期塑料闭合术与机械通气发生率较低相关。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Feb;25(1):34-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395487. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
[Influence of selected factors on the treatment and prognosis in newborns with gastroschisis on the basis of own experience].基于自身经验探讨影响腹裂新生儿治疗及预后的相关因素
Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2013 Jan-Mar;17(1):37-46.
6
Preformed silos versus traditional abdominal wall closure in gastroschisis: 163 infants at a single institution.先天性腹裂中预制袋与传统腹壁闭合术的比较:单一机构的163例婴儿
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Feb;24(1):88-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357755. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
7
Improved outcomes in the treatment of gastroschisis using a preformed silo and delayed repair approach.采用预制袋和延迟修复方法治疗腹裂的效果改善。
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Mar;38(3):459-64; discussion 459-64. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50079.
8
The association of type of surgical closure on length of stay among infants with gastroschisis born≥34 weeks' gestation.妊娠≥34周的腹裂婴儿手术闭合类型与住院时间的相关性。
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Aug;49(8):1220-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.020. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
9
[Medical-surgical course of neonates with gastroschisis according to time, abdominal closure method and intestinal involvement: six years of experience].[根据时间、腹壁关闭方法和肠道受累情况分析先天性腹裂新生儿的外科治疗过程:六年经验]
Cir Pediatr. 2009 Oct;22(4):217-22.
10
The association between gestational age at delivery, closure type and perinatal outcomes in neonates with isolated gastroschisis.分娩时的胎龄、闭锁类型与单纯性先天性腹壁裂新生儿围生期结局的关系。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Apr;33(8):1393-1399. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1519538. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The outcomes of treatment between primary closure and staged closure in gastroschisis in the pre and post era of the bedside wound retractor silo placement technique.床边伤口牵开器袋状安置技术应用前后,腹裂患儿一期缝合与分期缝合的治疗效果。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jan 7;41(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05940-5.
2
Fetal Surgery for Gastroschisis-A Review with Emphasis on Minimally Invasive Procedures.先天性腹裂的胎儿手术——以微创手术为重点的综述
Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 15;9(3):416. doi: 10.3390/children9030416.
3
Sutureless closure for the management of gastroschisis.
用于腹裂治疗的无缝合闭合术。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul 25;6:31. doi: 10.21037/tgh-20-185. eCollection 2021.
4
Mode of delivery and mortality among neonates with gastroschisis: A population-based cohort in Texas.先天性腹壁裂新生儿的分娩方式与死亡率:德克萨斯州的一项基于人群的队列研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 May;33(3):204-212. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12554. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Single center protocol driven care in 150 patients with gastroschisis 1998-2017: collaboration improves results.1998 - 2017年150例腹裂患儿的单中心协议驱动式护理:合作改善治疗结果
Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 Nov;34(11):1171-1176. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4349-7. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
6
Variability of outcome reporting in Hirschsprung's Disease and gastroschisis: a systematic review.先天性巨结肠症和腹裂结局报告的变异性:系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 12;6:38969. doi: 10.1038/srep38969.
7
Challenges of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, as highlighted by a systematic review of gastroschisis management.一项关于腹裂治疗的系统评价所强调的,小型外科专科领域在改善证据基础方面面临的挑战。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 26;10(1):e0116908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116908. eCollection 2015.
8
Primary fascial closure versus staged closure with silo in patients with gastroschisis: a meta-analysis.原发性筋膜闭合与分期闭合联合腹壁下间隙隔离在腹裂患儿中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Apr;48(4):845-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.01.020.
9
Abdominal decompression in children.儿童腹部减压
Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:180797. doi: 10.1155/2012/180797. Epub 2012 Mar 22.