Suppr超能文献

老年人对重症监护的反应是否较弱?

Are elderly people less responsive to intensive care?

作者信息

Wu A W, Rubin H R, Rosen M J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 Jun;38(6):621-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb01419.x.

Abstract

Older patients may be excluded from intensive care units because of the perception that they will benefit less than younger patients. To determine if advanced age is associated with increased mortality independent of severity of illness, we compared older and middle-aged patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. We reviewed the charts of 130 patients age 75 years or older and 135 patients age 55 to 65 admitted over a 30-month period. We controlled for severity of illness using the Acute Physiology Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) system without including points for age (APACHE IIM). The groups were similar with regard to gender, whether or not they had a private attending physician, mean APACHE IIM score, and diagnoses, except that older patients had more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Hospital stay was slightly longer in the older group (37 vs. 39 days, rank sum, P less than .02). Hospital mortality was significantly greater in the older group (39% vs. 51%, Chi-square P less than .05) with a crude relative risk of 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.73). However, the relation of age group to mortality differed for patients with different diagnoses. When we used logistic regression to adjust for APACHE IIM, whether the patient had a private attending physician, primary admitting diagnosis, or presence of cancer, older patients did not have a significantly greater risk of dying (adjusted relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.12). When pulmonary artery catheterization was added to the model, it independently predicted mortality adjusted relative risk, 1.47; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.06.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

老年患者可能会被排除在重症监护病房之外,因为人们认为他们从中获得的益处不如年轻患者。为了确定高龄是否与独立于疾病严重程度的死亡率增加相关,我们比较了入住内科重症监护病房的老年患者和中年患者。我们回顾了在30个月期间收治的130名75岁及以上患者和135名55至65岁患者的病历。我们使用急性生理评估和慢性健康评估(APACHE II)系统控制疾病严重程度,不包括年龄得分(APACHE IIM)。两组在性别、是否有私人主治医生、平均APACHE IIM得分和诊断方面相似,只是老年患者慢性阻塞性肺疾病更多。老年组的住院时间略长(37天对39天,秩和检验,P<0.02)。老年组的医院死亡率显著更高(39%对51%,卡方检验P<0.05),粗略相对风险为1.32(95%置信区间[CI]:1.01,1.73)。然而,不同诊断的患者年龄组与死亡率的关系有所不同。当我们使用逻辑回归调整APACHE IIM、患者是否有私人主治医生、主要入院诊断或是否存在癌症时,老年患者的死亡风险没有显著增加(调整后相对风险,1.05;95%CI:0.97,1.12)。当将肺动脉导管插入术添加到模型中时,它独立预测死亡率(调整后相对风险,1.47;95%CI:1.05,2.06)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验