• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Give It Up For Baby: outcomes and factors influencing uptake of a pilot smoking cessation incentive scheme for pregnant women.为了宝宝戒烟:一项针对孕妇的试点戒烟激励计划的实施情况和影响因素。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 15;13:343. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-343.
2
Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial.孕期戒烟的经济激励措施:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 27;350:h134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h134.
3
'Breathe': the stop smoking service for pregnant women in Glasgow.《呼吸》:格拉斯哥为孕妇提供的戒烟服务。
Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):e1-e13. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
4
The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial.孕期戒烟激励试验(CPIT):一项 III 期随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Feb 14;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8.
5
Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: protocol for a single arm intervention study.孕期戒烟的经济激励措施:一项单臂干预研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Mar 15;13:66. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-66.
6
Smoking prevalence and smoking cessation services for pregnant women in Scotland.苏格兰孕妇的吸烟流行率和戒烟服务。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2010 Jan 21;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-5-1.
7
Representativeness of the participants in the smoking Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT): a cross-sectional study.孕期戒烟激励试验(CPIT)参与者的代表性:一项横断面研究。
Trials. 2016 Aug 26;17(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1552-5.
8
Birth weight differences between those offered financial voucher incentives for verified smoking cessation and control participants enrolled in the Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT), employing an intuitive approach and a Complier Average Causal Effects (CACE) analysis.在“孕期戒烟激励试验”(CPIT)中,对那些因经核实戒烟而获得经济代金券激励的参与者与对照组参与者的出生体重差异进行研究,采用直观方法和依从者平均因果效应(CACE)分析。
Trials. 2017 Jul 20;18(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2053-x.
9
CATCH: development of a home-based midwifery intervention to support young pregnant smokers to quit.CATCH:开发一种基于家庭的助产干预措施,以支持年轻孕妇戒烟。
Midwifery. 2009 Oct;25(5):473-82. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
10
Going Once, Going Twice: Using Willingness-to-Accept Auctions to Promote Smoking Cessation.一次叫价,两次叫价:利用接受意愿拍卖来促进戒烟。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1632-1635. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa065.

引用本文的文献

1
How and why do financial incentives contribute to helping people stop smoking? A realist review.金融激励措施如何以及为何有助于帮助人们戒烟?一项现实主义综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17967-3.
2
Usual care in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: qualitative findings from a mixed-methods process evaluation.在一项多中心随机对照试验中,常规护理为怀孕期间戒烟提供经济激励:混合方法过程评估的定性发现。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):e066494. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066494.
3
Effect of financial voucher incentives provided with UK stop smoking services on the cessation of smoking in pregnant women (CPIT III): pragmatic, multicentre, single blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.英国戒烟服务中提供的财务凭证激励对孕妇戒烟的影响(CPIT III):实用、多中心、单盲、3 期、随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2022 Oct 19;379:e071522. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071522.
4
How and why do financial incentives contribute to helping people stop smoking? A realist review protocol.金融激励措施如何以及为何有助于帮助人们戒烟?一项现实主义综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e060457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060457.
5
Assessment of the Relationship of Depression With Tobacco and Caffeine Use Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.大学生中抑郁症与烟草和咖啡因使用关系的评估:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2021 Oct 28;13(10):e19098. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19098. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Community Pharmacist-Led Interventions to Improve Preconception and Pregnancy Health: A Systematic Review.社区药剂师主导的改善孕前和孕期健康的干预措施:一项系统评价。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Oct 16;9(4):171. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9040171.
7
Mechanism Design of Health Care Blockchain System Token Economy: Development Study Based on Simulated Real-World Scenarios.医疗保健区块链系统代币经济的机制设计:基于模拟真实场景的发展研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 13;23(9):e26802. doi: 10.2196/26802.
8
Examining Responsiveness to an Incentive-Based Mobile Health App: Longitudinal Observational Study.考察基于激励的移动健康应用程序的响应性:纵向观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 10;22(8):e16797. doi: 10.2196/16797.
9
Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e-cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响吸烟孕妇使用尼古丁替代疗法和电子烟的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 22;5(5):CD013629. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013629.
10
Impact of specialist and primary care stop smoking support on socio-economic inequalities in cessation in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and national equity initial review completed 22 January 2019; final version accepted 19 July 2019 analysis.英国专业医疗和初级保健戒烟支持对戒烟方面社会经济不平等的影响:2019 年 1 月 22 日完成的系统评价和国家公平初步审查;2019 年 7 月 19 日接受最终版本分析。
Addiction. 2020 Jan;115(1):34-46. doi: 10.1111/add.14760. Epub 2019 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Paying the price for an incentive: an exploratory study of smokers' reasons for failing to complete an incentive based smoking cessation scheme.为激励付出代价:一项关于吸烟者未能完成基于激励的戒烟计划的原因的探索性研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Oct;17(4):212-8. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011084. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
2
Incentives for promoting smoking cessation: What we still do not know.促进戒烟的激励措施:我们仍未知晓的内容。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;2011(8):ED000027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000027.
3
Preventing adolescents' uptake of smoking.
Thorax. 2011 Oct;66(10):842-4. doi: 10.1136/thx.2011.161042. Epub 2011 Apr 17.
4
Competitions and incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟竞赛与激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13(4):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub4.
5
Smoking prevalence and smoking cessation services for pregnant women in Scotland.苏格兰孕妇的吸烟流行率和戒烟服务。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2010 Jan 21;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-5-1.
6
Time to first cigarette in the morning as an index of ability to quit smoking: implications for nicotine dependence.早晨吸第一支烟的时间作为戒烟能力的指标:对尼古丁依赖的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Nov;9 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S555-70. doi: 10.1080/14622200701673480.
7
Assessing the impact of smoking cessation services on reducing health inequalities in England: observational study.评估戒烟服务对减少英国健康不平等现象的影响:观察性研究。
Tob Control. 2007 Dec;16(6):400-4. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.021626.
8
Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy.孕期促进戒烟的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD001055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001055.pub2.
9
Randomised controlled trial using social support and financial incentives for high risk pregnant smokers: significant other supporter (SOS) program.针对高危怀孕吸烟者使用社会支持和经济激励措施的随机对照试验:重要他人支持者(SOS)计划。
Tob Control. 2000;9 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):III67-9. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_3.iii67.

为了宝宝戒烟:一项针对孕妇的试点戒烟激励计划的实施情况和影响因素。

Give It Up For Baby: outcomes and factors influencing uptake of a pilot smoking cessation incentive scheme for pregnant women.

机构信息

Public Health Department, NHS Tayside, Kings Cross Hospital, Clepington Road, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 15;13:343. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-343.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-13-343
PMID:23587161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3640949/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of incentives to promote smoking cessation is a promising technique for increasing the effectiveness of interventions. This study evaluated the smoking cessation outcomes and factors associated with success for pregnant smokers who registered with a pilot incentivised smoking cessation scheme in a Scottish health board area (NHS Tayside).

METHODS

All pregnant smokers who engaged with the scheme between March 2007 and December 2009 were included in the outcome evaluation which used routinely collected data. Data utilised included: the Scottish National Smoking Cessation Dataset; weekly and periodic carbon monoxide (CO) breath tests; status of smoking cessation quit attempts; and amount of incentive paid. Process evaluation incorporated in-depth interviews with a cross-sectional sample of service users, stratified according to level of engagement.

RESULTS

Quit rates for those registering with Give It Up For Baby were 54% at 4 weeks, 32% at 12 weeks and 17% at 3 months post partum (all data validated by CO breath test). Among the population of women identified as smoking at first booking over a one year period, 20.1% engaged with Give It Up For Baby, with 7.8% of pregnant smokers quit at 4 weeks. Pregnant smokers from more affluent areas were more successful with their quit attempt. The process evaluation indicates financial incentives can encourage attendance at routine advisory sessions where they are seen to form part of a wider reward structure, but work less well with those on lowest incomes who demonstrate high reliance on the financial reward.

CONCLUSIONS

Uptake of Give It Up For Baby by the target population was higher than for all other health board areas offering specialist or equivalent cessation services in Scotland. Quit successes also compared favorably with other specialist interventions, adding to evidence of the benefits of incentives in this setting. The process evaluation helped to explain variations in retention and quit rates achieved by the scheme.This study describes a series of positive outcomes achieved through the use of incentives to promote smoking cessation amongst pregnant smokers.

摘要

背景

激励措施在提高干预措施效果方面是一种很有前途的技术,可用于促进戒烟。本研究评估了在苏格兰医疗保健区(NHS 泰赛德)注册参与一项试点激励性戒烟计划的孕妇吸烟者的戒烟结果和成功相关因素。

方法

所有在 2007 年 3 月至 2009 年 12 月期间参与该计划的孕妇吸烟者都被纳入了该结果评估,该评估使用了常规收集的数据。利用的数据包括:苏格兰国家戒烟数据集;每周和定期的一氧化碳(CO)呼气测试;戒烟尝试的状态;以及支付的激励金额。过程评估包括根据参与程度进行分层的服务使用者横断面样本的深入访谈。

结果

参与“给宝贝戒烟”计划的人在 4 周时的戒烟率为 54%,12 周时为 32%,产后 3 个月时为 17%(所有数据均通过 CO 呼气测试验证)。在一年期间首次预约时被确定为吸烟的女性人群中,有 20.1%的人参与了“给宝贝戒烟”计划,其中有 7.8%的孕妇在 4 周时戒烟。来自较富裕地区的孕妇吸烟者戒烟尝试成功率更高。过程评估表明,经济激励措施可以鼓励孕妇吸烟者参加常规咨询会议,因为这些会议被视为更广泛奖励结构的一部分,但对于收入最低的人效果较差,因为他们高度依赖经济奖励。

结论

在苏格兰提供专家或同等戒烟服务的所有其他医疗保健区中,“给宝贝戒烟”计划的目标人群参与度高于其他地区。戒烟成功率也与其他专家干预措施相比具有优势,进一步证明了在这种环境下激励措施的好处。过程评估有助于解释该计划实现的保留率和戒烟率的差异。本研究描述了通过使用激励措施来促进孕妇吸烟者戒烟而取得的一系列积极成果。