Suppr超能文献

腹主动脉瘤和肾周动脉瘤血管内修复的前瞻性、多中心应用 Ventana 开窗系统经验。

Prospective, multicenter experience with the Ventana Fenestrated System for juxtarenal and pararenal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.065. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed preliminary results of the Ventana Fenestrated System (Endologix, Irvine, Calif) as an off-the-shelf integrated device for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (JAA) or pararenal aortic aneurysm (PAA) endovascular repair.

METHODS

From November 2010 to April 2012, seven centers enrolled 31 patients with JAAs or PAAs in an international clinical trial of the Ventana Fenestrated System. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were done predischarge and at 1 month, with continuing follow-up through 5 years. Core laboratory computed tomography imaging assessments were performed at 1 month and at each subsequent follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients (mean age, 73 years; 90% male) presented with mean aneurysm sac diameter of 6.0 cm. One patient with a short, reversed tapered infra-superior mesenteric artery (SMA) neck was enrolled under a protocol waiver. Among the 31 patients, one of five Ventana device models was used to preserve main renal arteries, the SMA, and celiac arteries; 20 patients (65%) received the same Ventana device (aligned fenestrations, 28-mm diameter). Median fluoroscopy and procedure times were 49 and 197 minutes, respectively; median hospital length of stay was 3.0 days. The 1-month clinical success rate was 94% (29 of 31), with no perioperative mortality. One intervention on day 26 was done to resolve limb kink/occlusion. A type IA endoleak and renal occlusion secondary to procedural device damage led to a reintervention on day 52 and dialysis at 5 months. During follow-up to 23 months, three non-aneurysm-related deaths occurred. No aneurysm rupture or conversion to open repair has occurred. One late migration with endoleak and covered renal stent fracture/occlusion occurred at 8 months in the patient with a short, reverse tapered infra-SMA neck performed under a protocol waiver, which was managed successfully with bilateral renal bypasses and endovascular repair of the endoleak. Another patient underwent late endovascular interventions to resolve bilateral renal stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The multicenter experience of the Ventana Fenestrated System supports its safety and early-term to midterm effectiveness for the endovascular repair of JAAs and PAAs. This off-the-shelf integrated system permits endovascular treatment of JAAs or PAAs; however, further expanded clinical experience and longer-term follow-up are needed to more fully assess this device system.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了 Ventana 开窗系统(Endologix,加利福尼亚欧文)作为一种现成的集成设备,用于治疗肾周主动脉瘤(JAA)或肾周主动脉瘤(PAA)的血管内修复。

方法

2010 年 11 月至 2012 年 4 月,7 个中心在 Ventana 开窗系统的国际临床试验中招募了 31 例 JAA 或 PAA 患者。在出院前和 1 个月进行临床和实验室评估,并通过 5 年的持续随访进行评估。核心实验室的计算机断层扫描成像评估在 1 个月和随后的每次随访时进行。

结果

患者(平均年龄 73 岁;90%为男性)的平均动脉瘤囊直径为 6.0cm。1 名肠系膜上动脉(SMA)颈短、反向锥形的患者因协议豁免而被纳入。在 31 名患者中,使用了 5 种 Ventana 设备模型中的 1 种来保留主要肾动脉、SMA 和腹腔动脉;20 名患者(65%)接受了相同的 Ventana 设备(对齐的开窗,直径 28mm)。中位数透视和手术时间分别为 49 分钟和 197 分钟;中位数住院时间为 3.0 天。1 个月的临床成功率为 94%(31 例中的 29 例),无围手术期死亡。1 例在第 26 天进行的干预是为了解决肢体扭曲/闭塞。1 例因程序设备损坏导致的 1A 型内漏和肾闭塞导致第 52 天再次干预和第 5 个月透析。在 23 个月的随访中,有 3 例与动脉瘤无关的死亡。没有动脉瘤破裂或转为开放修复。在因协议豁免而进行短反向锥形肠系膜下动脉颈的患者中,1 例在 8 个月时发生迟发性迁移伴内漏和覆盖肾支架断裂/闭塞,通过双侧肾旁路和内漏的血管内修复成功治疗。另一名患者因双侧肾狭窄进行了晚期血管内干预。

结论

Ventana 开窗系统的多中心经验支持其用于治疗 JAA 和 PAA 的血管内修复的安全性和早期至中期有效性。这种现成的集成系统允许治疗 JAA 或 PAA;然而,需要进一步扩大临床经验和长期随访,以更全面地评估该设备系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验