Ritter M A, Fechtman R W, Keating E M, Faris P M
Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, Mooresville, Indiana.
J Arthroplasty. 1990 Jun;5(2):187-9. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80239-1.
Both the Harris and the Charnley hip evaluation forms were applied to 191 ingrowth-type total hip arthroplasties in an attempt to determine the effectiveness of the hip score as an indicator of success following arthroplasty. The Harris form demonstrated significantly lower pain scores than the Charnley form and, consequently, failed patients more often due to pain. However, it is important to note that 32% of the hips that failed due to pain on the Harris form did not fail due to total score. This inconsistency prompts the authors to state that when using a hip form to evaluate the performance of a prosthesis, especially one of the ingrowth type, it is important to consider not only the average total score but also the percentage of patients still experiencing significant pain.
哈里斯和查恩利髋关节评估表均应用于191例骨长入型全髋关节置换术，以试图确定髋关节评分作为置换术后成功指标的有效性。哈里斯评估表显示的疼痛评分显著低于查恩利评估表，因此，因疼痛导致失败的患者更多。然而，需要注意的是，在哈里斯评估表中因疼痛而失败的髋关节中，有32%并非因总分而失败。这种不一致促使作者指出，在使用髋关节评估表来评估假体性能时，尤其是骨长入型假体，不仅要考虑平均总分，还要考虑仍有明显疼痛的患者百分比。
