• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断性腹腔镜检查在穿透性腹部创伤治疗中的应用:一项前瞻性非随机研究。

The management of penetrating abdominal trauma by diagnostic laparoscopy: a prospective non-randomized study.

作者信息

Karateke Faruk, Özdoğan Mehmet, Özyazıcı Sefa, Daş Koray, Menekşe Ebru, Gülnerman Yusuf Can, Bali Ilhan, Önel Safa, Gökler Cihan

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Jan;19(1):53-7. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.40799.

DOI:10.5505/tjtes.2013.40799
PMID:23588981
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) has been traditionally treated by exploratory laparotomy (EL). The aim of our study was to examine the use of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in the management of hemodynamically stable patients with PAT.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed to compare the outcomes of hemodynamically stable patients with suspected intra-abdominal injuries due to abdominal stab wounds who underwent either EL or DL. Data extracted for analysis included demographic information, operative findings, rates of non-therapeutic laparotomy, operation time, length of hospital stay, mortality, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-two hemodynamically stable patients were admitted to the trauma service. There were 45 male (86.5%) and 7 female (13.5%) patients. The average age was 34.5 years-old (18-60). 26 (50%) patients underwent EL, and 26 (50%) patients underwent DL. Re-exploration by laparotomy was required in 9 of the 26 cases (34.6%). Patients who underwent DL had significantly shorter hospital stays (1.82±0.63 days vs. 5.4±2.1 days, p<0.05) and shorter operation time (17.9±6.38 vs. 68.4±33.2 min, p<0.05) than patients who underwent EL.

CONCLUSION

Selective use of DL in the hemodinamically stable penetrating trauma patients effectively decreased the rate of negative laparotomies, minimized morbidity, and decreased hospital stay.

摘要

背景

穿透性腹部创伤(PAT)传统上采用剖腹探查术(EL)进行治疗。我们研究的目的是探讨诊断性腹腔镜检查(DL)在血流动力学稳定的PAT患者管理中的应用。

方法

进行一项前瞻性研究,比较因腹部刺伤而疑似腹内损伤的血流动力学稳定患者接受EL或DL的结果。提取用于分析的数据包括人口统计学信息、手术发现、非治疗性剖腹术的发生率、手术时间、住院时间、死亡率和术后并发症。

结果

52例血流动力学稳定的患者被收治到创伤科。其中男性45例(86.5%),女性7例(13.5%)。平均年龄为34.5岁(18 - 60岁)。26例(50%)患者接受了EL,26例(50%)患者接受了DL。26例中有9例(34.6%)需要再次进行剖腹探查术。与接受EL的患者相比,接受DL的患者住院时间明显更短(1.82±0.63天对5.4±2.1天,p<0.05),手术时间也更短(17.9±6.38对68.4±33.2分钟,p<0.05)。

结论

在血流动力学稳定的穿透性创伤患者中选择性使用DL可有效降低阴性剖腹术的发生率,将发病率降至最低,并缩短住院时间。

相似文献

1
The management of penetrating abdominal trauma by diagnostic laparoscopy: a prospective non-randomized study.诊断性腹腔镜检查在穿透性腹部创伤治疗中的应用:一项前瞻性非随机研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Jan;19(1):53-7. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.40799.
2
Minimally invasive is maximally effective: Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for penetrating abdominal injuries.微创即高效:穿透性腹部损伤的诊断与治疗性腹腔镜检查
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Jun;78(6):1076-83; discussion 1083-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000655.
3
Diagnostic laparoscopy decreases the rate of unnecessary laparotomies and reduces hospital costs in trauma patients.诊断性腹腔镜检查可降低创伤患者不必要剖腹手术的发生率,并降低医院成本。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001 Aug;11(4):207-11. doi: 10.1089/109264201750539718.
4
Laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma is a safe and effective alternative to laparotomy.腹腔镜探查在穿透性腹部创伤中是剖腹探查的一种安全有效的替代方法。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1618-1625. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6436-1. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Cost analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the evaluation of penetrating abdominal trauma.诊断性腹腔镜检查与剖腹手术在评估穿透性腹部创伤中的成本分析
Surg Endosc. 1997 Mar;11(3):272-6. doi: 10.1007/s004649900342.
6
A multi faceted quality improvement programme results in improved outcomes for the selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma in a developing world trauma centre.一个多方面的质量改进项目使发展中国家创伤中心穿透性腹部创伤的选择性非手术治疗结果得到改善。
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Management of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma in Children.微创外科在儿童穿透性腹部创伤治疗中的作用。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Aug;31(4):353-361. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726411. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
The use of laparoscopy as a primary diagnostic and therapeutic method in penetrating wounds of lower thoracal region.腹腔镜检查作为下胸部穿透伤的主要诊断和治疗方法的应用。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Feb;8(1):26-9.
9
Therapeutic laparoscopy for abdominal trauma.腹部创伤的治疗性腹腔镜检查
Surg Endosc. 2003 Mar;17(3):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8808-8. Epub 2002 Dec 4.
10
[Value of celioscopy in the diagnosis of abdominal wounds].[腹腔镜检查在腹部创伤诊断中的价值]
Ann Chir. 1995;49(7):602-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score as an indicator of clinical outcomes in patients with abdominal trauma in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.急诊腹部创伤患者中反向休克指数乘以简化运动评分作为临床结局指标的回顾性队列研究
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Apr;31(4):332-340. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.23798.
2
Laparoscopy has better performance than laparotomy in the treatment of stable penetrating abdominal trauma: A retrospective cross-sectional study in a trauma referral hospital in Colombia.在治疗稳定型穿透性腹部创伤方面,腹腔镜手术的表现优于开腹手术:哥伦比亚一家创伤转诊医院的回顾性横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 May 24;5(3):e640. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.640. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Laparoscopy vs. Laparotomy for the Management of Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
腹腔镜检查与剖腹手术治疗腹部创伤的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 8;9:817134. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.817134. eCollection 2022.
4
Laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma is a safe and effective alternative to laparotomy.腹腔镜探查在穿透性腹部创伤中是剖腹探查的一种安全有效的替代方法。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1618-1625. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6436-1. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Laparoscopic management of retroperitoneal injuries from penetrating abdominal trauma in haemodynamically stable patients.血流动力学稳定的腹部穿透伤所致腹膜后损伤的腹腔镜处理
J Minim Access Surg. 2019 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_199_17.
6
Characteristics and management of penetrating abdominal injuries in a German level I trauma center.德国一级创伤中心穿透性腹部损伤的特征与处理
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):315-321. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0911-1. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
7
Trauma laparoscopy: when to start and when to convert?腹腔镜创伤手术:何时开始,何时中转开腹?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1344-1352. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5812-6. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
8
A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for the Management of Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Reply.
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1526-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3397-6.
9
A Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for the Management of Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1524-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3354-4.
10
Surgical versus non-surgical management of abdominal injury.腹部损伤的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 13;2015(11):CD007383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007383.pub3.