Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Pain Med. 2013 Jul;14(7):994-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12092. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
To assess frequency of sedation in transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) and to analyze patient dissatisfaction and vasovagal rates.
Retrospective audit over a 6-year period, January 1, 2006-December 31, 2011.
Single academic center radiology pain management practice.
Four thousand four hundred thirty-two patients undergoing 6,878 consecutive TFESI.
Frequency of sedation for TFESI was assessed. Vasovagal and patient dissatisfaction rates were assessed, the latter by patients' responses to two follow-up survey questions at 2 weeks postprocedure.
Six thousand eight hundred seventy-eight TFESI were performed, of which only 0.1% (N = 7) were performed with sedation. Only 0.4% (N = 28) of TFESI were complicated by vasovagal reaction. Seventy-two percent (N = 4,980) of nonsedated patients responded to the survey. Overall medical care in the nonsedated was rated as: excellent 51%, very good 30%, good 15%, fair 3%, and poor 1%. Ninety-five percent confidence interval (CI) for the 3.9% of the nonsedated patients who rated their care at best "fair" was (3.3, 4.4%). Likelihood of referring friends/family members in nonsedated patients was: definitely 53%, probably 28%, uncertain 16%, probably not 3%, definitely not 0.2%. Ninety-five percent CI for the 3.2% of the nonsedated patients who would at best "probably not refer" their friends/family was (2.7, 3.7%).
In our radiology pain management practice, sedation was rarely utilized for TFESI. A small minority of nonsedated patients rated their care at best fair and would at best probably not refer friends/family members. TFESI can be performed without sedation with low patient dissatisfaction and low vasovagal rates.
评估经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(TFESI)中镇静的频率,并分析患者的不满和血管迷走神经反应率。
回顾性审计,时间跨度为 6 年,2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 12 月 31 日。
单家学术中心放射科疼痛管理实践。
4432 名接受 6878 次连续 TFESI 的患者。
评估了 TFESI 中镇静的频率。评估了血管迷走神经反应和患者不满的发生率,后者通过患者在术后 2 周的两次随访调查问题的回答得出。
共进行了 6878 次 TFESI,其中只有 0.1%(N=7)进行了镇静。只有 0.4%(N=28)的 TFESI 出现血管迷走神经反应并发症。72%(N=4980)未接受镇静的患者对调查做出了回应。未接受镇静的患者对非医疗护理的总体评价为:优秀 51%,非常好 30%,好 15%,一般 3%,差 1%。未接受镇静的患者中,认为护理最好为“一般”的 3.9%的 95%置信区间(CI)为(3.3,4.4)。未接受镇静的患者中,愿意向朋友/家人推荐的可能性为:肯定会 53%,可能会 28%,不确定 16%,可能不会 3%,肯定不会 0.2%。未接受镇静的患者中,最多只能“可能不会推荐”朋友/家人的 3.2%的 95%置信区间(CI)为(2.7,3.7)。
在我们的放射科疼痛管理实践中,TFESI 很少使用镇静。少数未接受镇静的患者对他们的护理评价最好是“一般”,最多只能“可能不会推荐”朋友/家人。TFESI 可以在没有镇静的情况下进行,患者的不满和血管迷走神经反应率较低。