前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验比较 PCM 颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术。美国 FDA IDE 临床试验 2 年结果。
A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.
机构信息
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
出版信息
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E907-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318296232f.
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective, multicenter, randomized Food and Drug Administration approved investigational device exemption clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PCM Cervical Disc compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of patients with degenerative spondylosis and neurological symptoms at 1 level between C3-C4 and C7-T1.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
Cervical disc arthroplasty in the treatment of symptomatic cervical spondylosis has been studied in other series. The PCM Cervical Disc is a nonconstrained motion-sparing alternative to ACDF.
METHODS
Patients 18 to 65 years of age with single-level symptomatic cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy and/or myelopathy unresponsive to nonoperative treatment were enrolled, including patients with prior nonadjacent or adjacent single-level fusions. The per-protocol patient sample at 2 years included 342 patients (189 PCM, 153 ACDF). Longitudinal outcomes were comparatively evaluated.
RESULTS
At 2 years postoperatively, clinical measures-neck and arm pain visual analogue scale, Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36, and neurological status-were significantly improved from preoperative baselines in both groups. Mean NDI score at 2 years was significantly lower in PCM group (P = 0.029). There were no statistical differences between groups in rates of surgery-related serious adverse events (5.6% PCM, 7.4% ACDF) or secondary surgical procedures (5.2% PCM, 5.4% ACDF). Patients with PCM reported lower dysphagia scores (8.8/100 vs. 12.1/100; P = 0.045) and higher patient satisfaction (82.8/100 vs. 81.4/100). Overall success, a composite endpoint including minimum 20% NDI improvement, no major complications, no neurological worsening, no secondary surgical procedures, and meeting radiographical criteria of motion for PCM and fusion for ACDF, was significantly greater in the PCM group (75.1% vs. 64.9%; P = 0.020).
CONCLUSION
The treatment of symptomatic single-level cervical spondylosis with PCM achieves clinical outcomes that are at least equivalent to ACDF while maintaining motion. At 2 years, patients with PCM had lower NDI scores, statistically lower rate of prolonged dysphagia, greater patient satisfaction, and superior overall success.
研究设计
前瞻性、多中心、随机食品和药物管理局批准的研究性设备豁免临床试验。
目的
评估 PCM 颈椎间盘与前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)治疗 C3-C4 和 C7-T1 之间 1 个水平的退行性颈椎病和神经症状患者的安全性和有效性。
背景资料概要
在其他系列研究中已经研究了颈椎间盘置换术治疗有症状的颈椎病。PCM 颈椎间盘是 ACDF 的一种非约束性、保留运动的替代方法。
方法
18 至 65 岁的单节段有症状的颈椎病患者,有神经根病和/或对非手术治疗无反应的颈椎病,包括有先前非相邻或相邻单节段融合的患者。2 年时的方案患者样本包括 342 名患者(189 名 PCM,153 名 ACDF)。比较评估纵向结果。
结果
术后 2 年,两组患者的颈部和手臂疼痛视觉模拟评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、SF-36 和神经状态均较术前基线显著改善。2 年时 PCM 组的平均 NDI 评分显著较低(P = 0.029)。两组之间手术相关严重不良事件(5.6%PCM,7.4%ACDF)或二次手术(5.2%PCM,5.4%ACDF)的发生率无统计学差异。PCM 组报告的吞咽困难评分较低(8.8/100 与 12.1/100;P = 0.045),患者满意度较高(82.8/100 与 81.4/100)。总体成功率,包括 NDI 至少改善 20%、无重大并发症、无神经恶化、无二次手术、符合 PCM 的运动和 ACDF 的融合的影像学标准,PCM 组显著更高(75.1%与 64.9%;P = 0.020)。
结论
PCM 治疗有症状的单节段颈椎病的临床结果至少与 ACDF 相当,同时保持运动。2 年时,PCM 组患者的 NDI 评分较低,吞咽困难的发生率较低,患者满意度较高,总体成功率较高。