*Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA †Pennsylvania Spine Institute, Harrisburg, PA ‡Trident Regional Medical Center, Charleston, SC §Paradigm Biostatistics LLC, Anoka, MN ¶StatTech Services LLC, Chapel Hill, NC; and ‖Globus Medical, Audubon, PA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2227-39. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000031.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, and controlled Investigational Device Exemption clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical safety and effectiveness of the selectively constrained SECURE-C (Globus Medical, Audubon, PA) Cervical Artificial Disc to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical total disc replacement has been developed as an alternative to ACDF by allowing segmental motion. Current cervical total disc replacement designs incorporate constrained and unconstrained metal-on-metal or metal-on-polymer articulating designs with various means of fixation. METHODS: A total of 380 patients from 18 investigational sites were prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized, treated surgically, and evaluated postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Clinical outcomes include overall success, visual analogue scale pain (right arm, left arm, and neck), neck disability index, neurological status, Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Status Survey questionnaires, range of motion, and adverse events. Bayesian statistical methods were used to analyze the outcomes. RESULTS: Overall success results demonstrated statistical superiority of the randomized SECURE-C group compared with the randomized ACDF group at 24 months, with a posterior probability of 100% using the protocol-specified criteria and 98.1% using Food and Drug Administration-defined criteria. At 24 months postoperatively, SECURE-C demonstrated clinically significant improvement in pain and function in terms of neck disability index, visual analogue scale, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. At 24 months, the percentage of patients experiencing secondary surgical interventions at the index level was statistically lower for the SECURE-C group (2.5%) than the ACDF group (9.7%). At 24 months, 84.6% of as-treated SECURE-C patients were range-of-motion successes. Satisfaction was high among SECURE-C patients. CONCLUSION: The selectively constrained SECURE-C Cervical Artificial Disc is as safe and effective as the standard of care, an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. SECURE-C is statistically superior in terms of overall success, index-level subsequent surgical procedures, and patient satisfaction, making it an attractive surgical option for patients with symptomatic cervical disc disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.
研究设计:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照的研究性设备豁免临床试验。
研究目的:比较选择性约束 SECURE-C(Globus Medical,Audubon,PA)颈椎人工椎间盘与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的临床安全性和有效性。
背景资料总结:颈椎间盘置换术已被开发为 ACDF 的替代方法,通过允许节段运动。目前的颈椎间盘置换设计采用约束和非约束金属对金属或金属对聚合物关节设计,并采用各种固定方式。
研究方法:18 个研究地点共前瞻性纳入 380 例患者。患者随机分组,接受手术治疗,并在术后 6 周、3 个月、6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月进行术后评估。临床结果包括整体成功率、视觉模拟量表疼痛(右臂、左臂和颈部)、颈部残疾指数、神经状态、36 项简短健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)、活动范围和不良事件。采用贝叶斯统计方法分析结果。
研究结果:整体成功率结果表明,根据方案规定的标准,随机 SECURE-C 组与随机 ACDF 组在 24 个月时具有统计学优势,后验概率为 100%,根据食品和药物管理局定义的标准为 98.1%。术后 24 个月时,与 ACDF 组相比,SECURE-C 组在颈椎残疾指数、视觉模拟量表和 36 项简短健康状况调查问卷方面,疼痛和功能有显著的临床改善。24 个月时,指数水平再次手术干预的患者比例在 SECURE-C 组(2.5%)显著低于 ACDF 组(9.7%)。24 个月时,84.6%的 SECURE-C 患者在活动范围方面取得成功。SECURE-C 患者满意度高。
研究结论:选择性约束 SECURE-C 颈椎人工椎间盘与标准治疗方法,即前路颈椎间盘切除融合术一样安全有效。在整体成功率、指数水平后续手术程序和患者满意度方面,SECURE-C 具有统计学优势,使其成为有症状的颈椎间盘疾病患者的一种有吸引力的手术选择。
证据水平:1.
Int J Spine Surg. 2025-4-7
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024-6
Front Surg. 2022-9-6