• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

球窝型颈椎间盘置换术的定性和定量检索分析

Qualitative and quantitative retrieval analysis of a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement.

作者信息

Wahbeh Jenna M, Sangiorgio Sophia N, Park Sang-Hyun, Cornwall G Bryan, Kulkarni Neha V, Chiesa Roberto, Ebramzadeh Edward

机构信息

The J. Vernon Luck, Sr., M.D. Orthopaedic Research Center, The Luskin Orthopaedic Institute for Children in Alliance with UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Henry Samueli School of Engineering Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jul 5;23:100768. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100768. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100768
PMID:40791669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12337878/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Porous Coated Motion (PCM) is a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement with excellent reported short-term clinical outcome. However, longer-term studies identified migration as a common cause of implant removal and the device was withdrawn from the market. Given these discrepancies, retrieval analyses are crucial to assess whether preclinical testing accurately predicts clinical performance. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze retrieved PCM devices to identify primary reasons for removal and assess the impact of observed damage on overall device fixation.

METHODS

Thirty-seven PCM devices were received for postmarket surveillance. Nondestructive analysis included visual examination, photographic documentation, and radiographic review. Analytical measurements were performed using a coordinate measuring machine to assess articulating surfaces or a digital microscope for endplate surface feature characterization. Oxidation analysis was performed on all devices with adequate handling and storage conditions, and histopathology was performed when tissue samples were available.

RESULTS

Twenty-five devices met the inclusion criteria for this study. The mean patient age at retrieval was 45.3±13.5 years, with an average time-in-vivo of 121±15.6 days. Anterior migration was the most common reason for removal, reported in 17 cases, with the inferior convex polyethylene component predominately migrating. Additionally, 17 devices had a focalized deviation on the posterior quadrant of the articulating polyethylene ball, 11 of which had evidence of radiographic clinical migration. Histopathology and metrology findings indicated that wear debris did not contribute to clinical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study, specifically the minimal bony ongrowth, lack of extraction damage, and radiographic imaging, indicated that most devices were removed due to migration. Metrology analysis revealed a depression on the posterior edge of the inferior endplate polyethylene ball, which correlated with anterior slippage. This may be a distinctive feature of the PCM's relatively large ball-and-socket design that led to increased stress during extension, causing anterior migration.

摘要

背景

多孔涂层活动型(PCM)是一种球窝式颈椎间盘置换物,据报道其短期临床效果良好。然而,长期研究发现移位是植入物取出的常见原因,该装置已退出市场。鉴于这些差异,取出物分析对于评估临床前测试是否能准确预测临床性能至关重要。本研究旨在对取出的PCM装置进行定量和定性分析,以确定取出的主要原因,并评估观察到的损伤对整体装置固定的影响。

方法

接收了37个用于上市后监测的PCM装置。非破坏性分析包括目视检查、摄影记录和放射学检查。使用坐标测量机对关节表面进行分析测量,或使用数字显微镜对终板表面特征进行表征。对所有处理和储存条件合适的装置进行氧化分析,有组织样本时进行组织病理学检查。

结果

25个装置符合本研究的纳入标准。取出时患者的平均年龄为45.3±13.5岁,体内平均时间为121±15.6天。向前移位是最常见的取出原因,17例报告为此原因取出,其中下凸聚乙烯部件移位占主导。此外,17个装置在关节聚乙烯球的后象限有局部偏差,其中11个有放射学临床移位的证据。组织病理学和计量学结果表明磨损碎屑不是临床失败的原因。

结论

本研究的结果,特别是最小的骨长入、无取出损伤和放射影像学表现,表明大多数装置是因移位而取出。计量学分析显示下终板聚乙烯球后缘有凹陷,这与向前滑动相关。这可能是PCM相对较大的球窝设计的一个独特特征,导致伸展时应力增加,引起向前移位。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/587dde5e3f31/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/9ca2a3bdfb2b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/551000ebb3a2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/26fe9b3b2f20/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/85a3d9b06e6a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/4f1b9e6245c2/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/587dde5e3f31/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/9ca2a3bdfb2b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/551000ebb3a2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/26fe9b3b2f20/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/85a3d9b06e6a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/4f1b9e6245c2/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c52/12337878/587dde5e3f31/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Qualitative and quantitative retrieval analysis of a ball-and-socket cervical disc replacement.球窝型颈椎间盘置换术的定性和定量检索分析
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jul 5;23:100768. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100768. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Design Factors Affecting the Fixation of Cervical Disc Replacements: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Aug 1;50(15):E299-E307. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005353. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
3
Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.单节段颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病中关节成形术与融合术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD009173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009173.pub2.
4
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Reasons for Revision Surgery After Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Based on Medical Device Reports Maintained by the US Food and Drug Administration.基于美国食品和药物管理局维护的医疗器械报告的颈椎间盘置换术后再次手术的原因。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Oct 15;49(20):1417-1425. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005060. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
Removals and Revisions of Cervical Total Disc Replacement Devices in a Consecutive Series of 1626 Patients Beginning With the First Case Experience in 2003.2003 年首例病例经验以来,对 1626 例连续系列患者进行颈椎全椎间盘置换装置的移除和修正。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Oct 1;49(19):1348-1351. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005039. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Observations of bony ongrowth and clinical fixation in two retrieved disc replacements.
两个取出的椎间盘置换物中观察到骨生长和临床固定。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2023 Sep;111(9):1653-1663. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35263. Epub 2023 May 16.
4
Femoral stem migration after direct lateral and direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.直接外侧入路和直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术后股骨柄迁移:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Can J Surg. 2022 Aug 4;65(4):E487-E495. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013221. Print 2022 Jul-Aug.
5
Retrieval analysis of an explanted Mobi-C cervical disc replacement: A case study.取出的 Mobi-C 颈椎间盘置换物的检索分析:案例研究。
Med Eng Phys. 2021 Apr;90:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
An Anterior Dislocation after Mobi-C Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.Mobi-C颈椎间盘置换术后的前脱位
Asian J Neurosurg. 2020 Aug 28;15(3):719-721. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_147_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
7
A cross-sectional analysis of 1347 complications for cervical disc replacements from medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration.美国食品和药物管理局维护的医疗器械报告中 1347 例颈椎间盘置换并发症的横断面分析。
Spine J. 2021 Feb;21(2):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
8
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Migration Following Mechanical Intubation: A Case Presentation and Review of the Literature.颈椎间盘置换术后机械通气导致的移植物迁移:病例报告和文献复习。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:244-249. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.037. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
The transfemoral approach for controlled removal of well-fixed femoral stems in hip revision surgery.在髋关节翻修手术中,经股入路用于可控取出固定良好的股骨柄。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jan-Feb;11(1):33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术与颈椎融合术治疗颈椎间盘退变疾病的卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(3):1-223. eCollection 2019.