Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis, Biotechnology Research Area, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Blood. 2013 Jun 6;121(23):4778-81. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-01-478891. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
Standardized response criteria to interpret and compare clinical trials are needed for approval of new therapeutic agents by regulatory agencies. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) response criteria for essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) issued in 2009 have been widely adopted as end points in a number of recent clinical trials. However, evidence exists that they do not predict response or provide clinically relevant measures of benefit for the patients. This article presents revised recommendations for assessing response in ET and PV provided by a working group established by ELN and International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment. New definitions of complete and partial remission incorporate clinical, hematological, and histological response assessments that include a standardized symptom assessment form and consider absence of disease progression and vascular events. We anticipate that these criteria will be adopted widely to facilitate the development of new and more effective therapies for ET and PV.
为了使监管机构批准新的治疗药物,需要有标准化的反应标准来解释和比较临床试验。2009 年欧洲白血病网络(ELN)发布的特发性血小板增多症(ET)和真性红细胞增多症(PV)的反应标准已被广泛用作许多近期临床试验的终点。然而,有证据表明,这些标准并不能预测反应,也不能为患者提供有临床意义的获益衡量标准。本文介绍了由 ELN 和国际骨髓增殖性肿瘤研究和治疗工作组设立的工作组提出的用于评估 ET 和 PV 反应的修订建议。新的完全和部分缓解定义包括临床、血液学和组织学反应评估,其中包括标准化的症状评估表,并考虑疾病进展和血管事件的不存在。我们预计这些标准将被广泛采用,以促进开发用于 ET 和 PV 的新的、更有效的治疗方法。