Iwatsuki K, Nishikawa K, Chaki M, Sato A, Morita A, Hirata H
1Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014 Feb;39(2):145-51. doi: 10.1177/1753193413485524. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
This study compared the responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the Japanese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-JSSH) questionnaires in carpal tunnel syndrome. The scores before and 3 months after surgery were used to calculate the standardized response mean and effect size. Of 57 patients enrolled in the study, 13 underwent open carpal tunnel release and 44 had endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The standardized response mean and the effect size of the Hand 20 scale were 0.60 and 0.54, respectively, and those of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scale were 0.39 and 0.36, respectively. Compared with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Hand 20 questionnaire appears to have better responsiveness for assessing the effect of treatment by carpal tunnel release.
本研究比较了手部功能20项问卷(Hand 20)和日本版手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷(DASH-JSSH)在腕管综合征中的反应性。采用手术前和术后3个月的评分来计算标准化反应均值和效应量。在纳入研究的57例患者中,13例行开放性腕管松解术,44例行内镜下腕管松解术。手部功能20项量表的标准化反应均值和效应量分别为0.60和0.54,手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍量表的标准化反应均值和效应量分别为0.39和0.36。与手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍问卷相比,手部功能20项问卷在评估腕管松解术的治疗效果方面似乎具有更好的反应性。