Suppr超能文献

整合照护的障碍与促进因素:来自英国综合照护试点的经验。

Barriers and facilitators to integrating care: experiences from the English Integrated Care Pilots.

机构信息

RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK and Currently Head of Impact, Innovation and Evidence, Save the Children, 1 St John's Lane, London, EC1M 4AR, UK.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2012 Jul 24;12:e129. doi: 10.5334/ijic.982. Print 2012 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2008, the English Department of Health appointed 16 'Integrated Care Pilots' which used a range of approaches to provide better integrated care. We report qualitative analyses from a three-year multi-method evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to successful integration of care.

THEORY AND METHODS

Data were analysed from transcripts of 213 in-depth staff interviews, and from semi-structured questionnaires (the 'Living Document') completed by staff in pilot sites at six points over a two-year period. Emerging findings were therefore built from 'bottom up' and grounded in the data. However, we were then interested in how these findings compared and contrasted with more generic analyses. Therefore after our analyses were complete we then systematically compared and contrasted the findings with the analysis of barriers and facilitators to quality improvement identified in a systematic review by Kaplan et al. (2010) and the analysis of more micro-level shapers of behaviour found in Normalisation Process Theory (May et al. 2007). Neither of these approaches claims to be full blown theories but both claim to provide mid-range theoretical arguments which may be used to structure existing data and which can be undercut or reinforced by new data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Many barriers and facilitators to integrating care are those of any large-scale organisational change. These include issues relating to leadership, organisational culture, information technology, physician involvement, and availability of resources. However, activities which appear particularly important for delivering integrated care include personal relationships between leaders in different organisations, the scale of planned activities, governance and finance arrangements, support for staff in new roles, and organisational and staff stability. We illustrate our analyses with a 'routemap' which identifies questions that providers may wish to consider when planning interventions to improve the integration of care.

摘要

背景

2008 年,英国卫生部任命了 16 个“综合护理试点”,这些试点采用了一系列方法来提供更好的综合护理。我们报告了一项为期三年的多方法评估的定性分析结果,以确定成功整合护理的障碍和促进因素。

理论与方法

对来自 213 次深度员工访谈的记录以及来自试点地点工作人员在两年期间六个时间点完成的半结构化问卷(“活文档”)的数据进行了分析。因此,新出现的发现是从“自下而上”构建的,并基于数据。然而,我们随后对这些发现如何与更通用的分析进行比较和对比感兴趣。因此,在我们的分析完成后,我们系统地将发现与 Kaplan 等人(2010 年)进行的系统评价中确定的质量改进障碍和促进因素分析以及 May 等人(2007 年)发现的更微观水平行为塑造因素分析进行了比较和对比。这两种方法都不声称是完整的理论,但都声称提供了可以用于构建现有数据的中层理论论点,并且可以通过新数据来削弱或加强这些论点。

结果与讨论

整合护理的许多障碍和促进因素是任何大规模组织变革的障碍和促进因素。这些问题包括与领导、组织文化、信息技术、医生参与以及资源可用性有关的问题。然而,对于提供综合护理似乎特别重要的活动包括不同组织的领导者之间的个人关系、计划活动的规模、治理和财务安排、对新角色工作人员的支持以及组织和员工的稳定性。我们通过“路线图”来说明我们的分析,该路线图确定了提供者在计划干预措施以改善护理整合时可能希望考虑的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7d1/3601528/31fbb027fb27/ijic2012-2012129-001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验