Dhaliwal Jasmeet S, Crane Lori A, Valley Morgan A, Lowenstein Steven R
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Apr 17;6:154. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-154.
Medical schools frequently experience challenges related to diversity and inclusiveness. The authors conducted this study to assess, from a student body's perspective, the climate at one medical school with respect to diversity, inclusiveness and cross-cultural understanding.
In 2008 students in the doctor of medicine (MD), physical therapy (PT) and physician assistant programs at a public medical school were asked to complete a diversity climate survey consisting of 24 Likert-scale, short-answer and open-ended questions. Questions were designed to measure student experiences and attitudes in three domains: the general diversity environment and culture; witnessed negative speech or behaviors; and diversity and the learning environment. Students were also asked to comment on the effectiveness of strategies aimed at promoting diversity, including diversity and sensitivity training, pipeline programs, student scholarships and other interventions. Survey responses were summarized using proportions and 95 percent confidence intervals (95% CI), as well as inductive content analysis.
Of 852 eligible students, 261 (31%) participated in the survey. Most participants agreed that the school of medicine (SOM) campus is friendly (90%, 95% CI 86 to 93) and welcoming to minority groups (82%, 95% CI 77 to 86). Ninety percent (95% CI 86 to 93) found educational value in a diverse faculty and student body. However, only 37 percent (95% CI 30 to 42) believed the medical school is diverse. Many survey participants reported they have witnessed other students or residents make disparaging remarks or exhibit offensive behaviors toward minority groups, most often targeting persons with strong religious beliefs (43%, 95% CI 37 to 49), low socioeconomic status (35%, 95% CI 28 to 40), non-English speakers (34%, 95% CI 28 to 40), women (30%, 95% CI 25 to 36), racial or ethnic minorities (28%, 95% CI 23 to 34), or gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered (GLBT) individuals (25%, 95% CI 20 to 30). Students witnessed similar disparaging or offensive behavior by faculty members toward persons with strong religious beliefs (18%, 95% CI 14 to 24), persons of low socioeconomic status (12%, 95% CI 9 to 17), non-English speakers (10%, 95% CI 6 to 14), women (18%, 95% CI 14 to 24), racial or ethnic minorities (12%, 95% CI 8 to 16) and GLBT individuals (7%, 95% CI 4 to 11). Students' open-ended comments reinforced the finding that persons holding strong religious beliefs or conservative values were the most common targets of disparaging or offensive behavior.
These data suggest that medical students believe that diversity and a climate of inclusiveness and respect are important to a medical school's educational and clinical care missions. However, according to these students, the institution must embrace a broader definition of diversity, such that all minority groups are valued, including individuals with conservative viewpoints or strong religious beliefs, the poor and uninsured, GLBT individuals, women and non-English speakers.
医学院校经常面临与多样性和包容性相关的挑战。作者开展这项研究,旨在从学生群体的角度评估一所医学院校在多样性、包容性和跨文化理解方面的氛围。
2008年,一所公立医学院的医学博士(MD)、物理治疗(PT)和医师助理专业的学生被要求完成一项多样性氛围调查,该调查由24个李克特量表、简答题和开放式问题组成。问题旨在衡量学生在三个领域的经历和态度:一般多样性环境和文化;目睹的负面言论或行为;多样性与学习环境。学生们还被要求对旨在促进多样性的策略的有效性发表评论,包括多样性和敏感性培训、输送计划、学生奖学金及其他干预措施。调查回复采用比例和95%置信区间(95%CI)进行总结,并进行归纳性内容分析。
在852名符合条件的学生中,261名(31%)参与了调查。大多数参与者认为医学院校园友好(90%,95%CI为86%至93%)且欢迎少数群体(82%,95%CI为77%至86%)。90%(95%CI为86%至93%)的人发现在多元化的教师队伍和学生群体中有教育价值。然而,只有37%(95%CI为30%至42%)的人认为医学院是多元化的。许多参与调查的学生报告说,他们目睹其他学生或住院医生对少数群体发表诋毁性言论或表现出冒犯性行为,最常针对的是有强烈宗教信仰的人(43%,95%CI为37%至49%)、社会经济地位低的人(35%,95%CI为28%至40%)、非英语使用者(34%,95%CI为28%至40%)、女性(30%,95%CI为25%至36%)、少数种族或族裔(28%,95%CI为23%至34%)或同性恋、双性恋或变性者(GLBT)(25%,95%CI为20%至30%)。学生们目睹教师对有强烈宗教信仰的人(18%,95%CI为14%至24%)、社会经济地位低的人(12%,95%CI为9%至17%)、非英语使用者(10%,95%CI为6%至14%)、女性(18%,95%CI为14%至24%)、少数种族或族裔(12%,95%CI为8%至16%)和GLBT发表类似的诋毁或冒犯行为(7%,95%CI为4%至11%)。学生们的开放式评论强化了这样一个发现,即持有强烈宗教信仰或保守价值观的人是诋毁或冒犯行为最常见的目标。
这些数据表明,医学生认为多样性以及包容和尊重的氛围对医学院校的教育和临床护理使命很重要。然而,根据这些学生的说法,该机构必须采用更广泛的多样性定义,使所有少数群体都受到重视,包括持有保守观点或有强烈宗教信仰的个人、穷人和未参保者、GLBT、女性和非英语使用者。