Suppr超能文献

生物样本库中的潜在偏倚:在基于诊所的生物样本库中,拒绝者、无应答者和参与者有何不同?

Potential bias in the bank: what distinguishes refusers, nonresponders and participants in a clinic-based biobank?

作者信息

Ridgeway J L, Han L C, Olson J E, Lackore K A, Koenig B A, Beebe T J, Ziegenfuss J Y

机构信息

Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2013;16(3):118-26. doi: 10.1159/000349924. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biobanks are an important resource for genetic and epidemiologic research, but bias may be introduced if those who accept the recruitment invitation differ systematically from those who do not in terms of attributes important to health-related investigations. To understand potential bias in a clinic-based biobank of biological samples, including genetic data linked to electronic health record information, we compared patient characteristics and self-reported information among participants, nonresponders and refusers. We also compared reasons for nonparticipation between refusers and nonresponders to elucidate potential pathways to reduce nonparticipation and any uncovered bias.

METHODS

We mailed recruitment packets to 1,600 adult patients with upcoming appointments at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minn., USA) and recorded their participation status. Administrative data were used to compare characteristics across groups. We used phone interviews with 26 nonresponders and 26 refusers to collect self-reported information, including reasons for nonparticipation. Participants were asked to complete a mailed questionnaire.

RESULTS

We achieved 26.2% participation (n=419) with 12.1% refusing (n=193) and 61.8% nonresponse (n=988). In multivariate analyses, sex, age, region of residence, and race/ethnicity were significantly associated with participation. The groups differed in information-seeking behaviors and research experience. Refusers more often cited privacy concerns, while nonresponders more often identified time constraints as the reason for nonparticipation.

CONCLUSION

For genomic medicine to advance, large, representative biobanks are required. Significant associations between patient characteristics and nonresponse, as well as systematic differences between refusers and nonresponders, could introduce bias. Oversampling or recruitment changes, including heightened attention to privacy protection and participation burden, may be necessary to increase participation among less-represented groups.

摘要

背景

生物样本库是遗传和流行病学研究的重要资源,但如果接受招募邀请者在对健康相关调查至关重要的属性方面与未接受者存在系统性差异,可能会引入偏差。为了解基于诊所的生物样本库(包括与电子健康记录信息相关的基因数据)中的潜在偏差,我们比较了参与者、无回应者和拒绝者的患者特征及自我报告信息。我们还比较了拒绝者和无回应者不参与的原因,以阐明减少不参与情况及任何发现的偏差的潜在途径。

方法

我们向美国明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所即将预约就诊的1600名成年患者邮寄了招募资料包,并记录他们的参与状态。使用管理数据比较各组特征。我们对26名无回应者和26名拒绝者进行电话访谈,以收集自我报告信息,包括不参与的原因。要求参与者填写邮寄的问卷。

结果

我们实现了26.2%的参与率(n = 419),12.1%的拒绝率(n = 193)和61.8%的无回应率(n = 988)。在多变量分析中,性别、年龄、居住地区和种族/民族与参与显著相关。各组在信息寻求行为和研究经验方面存在差异。拒绝者更常提及隐私问题,而无回应者更常将时间限制作为不参与的原因。

结论

为推动基因组医学发展,需要大型、具有代表性的生物样本库。患者特征与无回应之间的显著关联以及拒绝者和无回应者之间的系统性差异可能会引入偏差。可能需要进行过采样或招募调整,包括更加关注隐私保护和参与负担,以提高代表性较低群体的参与度。

相似文献

1
Potential bias in the bank: what distinguishes refusers, nonresponders and participants in a clinic-based biobank?
Public Health Genomics. 2013;16(3):118-26. doi: 10.1159/000349924. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
3
Characteristics Associated With Recruitment and Re-contact in Mayo Clinic Biobank.
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;8:9. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00009. eCollection 2020.
6
The Mayo Clinic Biobank: a building block for individualized medicine.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Sep;88(9):952-62. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.006.
7
Factors that influence characteristics of genetic biobanks.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(1):25-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00139.x.
8
Motivating and Discouraging Factors for Bipolar Patient Participation in Genomic Research.
Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(3-4):89-98. doi: 10.1159/000513723. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
9
Surveys using general practice registers: who are the non-responders?
J Public Health Med. 1996 Mar;18(1):6-12. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024464.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Selection biases in the systematic collection of breast biobank specimens.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Aug 1;11(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00798-9.
3
Motives for withdrawal of participation in biobanking and participants' willingness to allow linkages of their data.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar;30(3):367-377. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00997-5. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
6
«If you give them your little finger, they'll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research.
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09969-w.
7
Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank.
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 25;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00504-3.
8
Why African Americans say "No": A Study of Pharmacogenomic Research Participation.
Ethn Dis. 2020 Apr 2;30(Suppl 1):159-166. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.S1.159. eCollection 2020.
9
Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):365-378. doi: 10.1177/1556264619888365. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

3
Biobank Recruitment: Motivations for Nonparticipation.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2009 Jun;7(2):119-121. doi: 10.1089/bio.2009.0006.
4
Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 8;5(10):e13302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013302.
5
Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(6):368-77. doi: 10.1159/000276767. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
6
Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.
Genet Med. 2010 Aug;12(8):486-95. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e38f9e.
9
Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
Lancet Oncol. 2008 May;9(5):485-93. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70128-1.
10
Factors that influence characteristics of genetic biobanks.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(1):25-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00139.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验