Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, NTNU, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09969-w.
Why do some people withdraw from biobank studies? To our knowledge, very few studies have been done on the reflections of biobank ex-participants. In this article, we report from such a study. 16 years ago, we did focus group interviews with biobank participants and ex-participants. We found that the two groups interestingly shared worries concerning the risks involved in possible novel uses of their biobank material, even though they drew opposite conclusions from their worries. Revisiting these interviews today reveals a remarkable relevance to present concerns, since the possible developments that worried ex-participants and participants 16 years ago now are becoming realities. Drawing on conceptual distinctions by sociologist and philosopher Niklas Luhmann, we argue that while ex-participants express a loss of trust in the biobank institution to manage the use of their biobank material in a legitimate way, remaining participants expressed confidence in the management of the biobank institution to secure their interests. This analysis brings out important aspects of emerging trends in biobank research participation.
为什么有些人会退出生物银行研究?据我们所知,很少有研究关注生物银行前参与者的反思。在本文中,我们报告了这样一项研究。16 年前,我们对生物银行的参与者和前参与者进行了焦点小组访谈。我们发现,这两个群体有趣地共同关注着他们的生物银行材料可能被用于新用途所带来的风险,尽管他们从这些担忧中得出了相反的结论。今天重新审视这些访谈,发现它们与当前的关注点非常相关,因为 16 年前让前参与者和参与者感到担忧的可能发展现在正在成为现实。我们借鉴了社会学家和哲学家尼克拉斯·卢曼的概念区分,认为虽然前参与者表示对生物银行机构管理其生物银行材料的合法使用失去了信任,但仍有参与者对生物银行机构管理生物银行材料以确保其利益表示信任。这种分析揭示了生物库研究参与中出现的趋势的重要方面。