Suppr超能文献

“如果你给他们小拇指,他们就会扯掉你的整条胳膊”:对生物银行研究失去信任。

«If you give them your little finger, they'll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, NTNU, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09969-w.

Abstract

Why do some people withdraw from biobank studies? To our knowledge, very few studies have been done on the reflections of biobank ex-participants. In this article, we report from such a study. 16 years ago, we did focus group interviews with biobank participants and ex-participants. We found that the two groups interestingly shared worries concerning the risks involved in possible novel uses of their biobank material, even though they drew opposite conclusions from their worries. Revisiting these interviews today reveals a remarkable relevance to present concerns, since the possible developments that worried ex-participants and participants 16 years ago now are becoming realities. Drawing on conceptual distinctions by sociologist and philosopher Niklas Luhmann, we argue that while ex-participants express a loss of trust in the biobank institution to manage the use of their biobank material in a legitimate way, remaining participants expressed confidence in the management of the biobank institution to secure their interests. This analysis brings out important aspects of emerging trends in biobank research participation.

摘要

为什么有些人会退出生物银行研究?据我们所知,很少有研究关注生物银行前参与者的反思。在本文中,我们报告了这样一项研究。16 年前,我们对生物银行的参与者和前参与者进行了焦点小组访谈。我们发现,这两个群体有趣地共同关注着他们的生物银行材料可能被用于新用途所带来的风险,尽管他们从这些担忧中得出了相反的结论。今天重新审视这些访谈,发现它们与当前的关注点非常相关,因为 16 年前让前参与者和参与者感到担忧的可能发展现在正在成为现实。我们借鉴了社会学家和哲学家尼克拉斯·卢曼的概念区分,认为虽然前参与者表示对生物银行机构管理其生物银行材料的合法使用失去了信任,但仍有参与者对生物银行机构管理生物银行材料以确保其利益表示信任。这种分析揭示了生物库研究参与中出现的趋势的重要方面。

相似文献

1
«If you give them your little finger, they'll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research.
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Dec;23(4):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09969-w.
2
Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Nov;69(11):1125-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205215. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
3
The moral concerns of biobank donors: the effect of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate.
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2016;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s40504-016-0036-4. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
4
Governing UK Biobank: the importance of ensuring public trust.
Trends Biotechnol. 2004 Jun;22(6):284-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.007.
5
Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank.
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 25;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00504-3.
6
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May;158A(5):1029-37. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34414. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
7
Biobanking in the subcontinent: exploring concerns.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct-Dec;2(4):248-254. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.065.
8
Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
Qual Health Res. 2019 Nov;29(13):1942-1953. doi: 10.1177/1049732318791826. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Biobank research and the right to privacy.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2008;29(4):267-85. doi: 10.1007/s11017-008-9079-8. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
10
Biobank Participants' Attitudes Toward Data Sharing and Privacy: The Role of Trust in Reducing Perceived Risks.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):167-176. doi: 10.1177/15562646211055282. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Trust and Support for Cancer Research Biobanks: Insights from Cancer Patients in Poland.
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jun 13;30:e944263. doi: 10.12659/MSM.944263.
6
Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052552.
7
Biobanking and risk assessment: a comprehensive typology of risks for an adaptive risk governance.
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2021 Dec 13;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40504-021-00117-7.
8
Motives for withdrawal of participation in biobanking and participants' willingness to allow linkages of their data.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar;30(3):367-377. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00997-5. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
9
What does engagement mean to participants in longitudinal cohort studies? A qualitative study.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 24;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00648-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Why African Americans say "No": A Study of Pharmacogenomic Research Participation.
Ethn Dis. 2020 Apr 2;30(Suppl 1):159-166. doi: 10.18865/ed.30.S1.159. eCollection 2020.
3
Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):365-378. doi: 10.1177/1556264619888365. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
Public Attitudes toward Biobanking of Human Biological Material for Research Purposes: A Literature Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 21;16(12):2209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122209.
5
From engaging publics to engaging knowledges: Enacting "appropriateness" in the Austrian biobank infrastructure.
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Apr;28(3):275-289. doi: 10.1177/0963662518806451. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
6
Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.
Qual Health Res. 2019 Nov;29(13):1942-1953. doi: 10.1177/1049732318791826. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
7
"I don't want to be Henrietta Lacks": diverse patient perspectives on donating biospecimens for precision medicine research.
Genet Med. 2019 Jan;21(1):107-113. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0032-6. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
8
9
Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Mar 2;100(3):414-427. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
10
A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States.
Genet Med. 2016 Jul;18(7):663-71. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.138. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验