• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭子宫活动监测与早产率降低相关。

Home uterine activity monitoring is associated with a reduction in preterm birth.

作者信息

Hill W C, Fleming A D, Martin R W, Hamer C, Knuppel R A, Lake M F, Watson D L, Welch R A, Bentley D L, Gookin K S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):13S-18S.

PMID:2359574
Abstract

The value of home uterine activity monitoring plus perinatal nursing support in the prevention of preterm birth among high-risk patients has been demonstrated by several studies. Other reports with less stringent guidelines and less intensive nursing contact have questioned the contribution of home uterine activity monitoring and perinatal nursing support to a preterm birth prevention program. In this large, prospective, randomized multicenter study, patients were assigned to receive either daily monitoring and nursing contact or a preterm birth prevention program including intensive education and more frequent prenatal visits. Among the monitored patients, there was a significant increase in early detection of preterm labor (2 cm or less), successful tocolysis, and prolongation of pregnancy to term. Thirty-one percent of these diagnoses of preterm labor resulted from evaluation of increased uterine activity without associated patient-perceived symptoms. We conclude that a program of daily uterine activity monitoring and perinatal nursing support results in earlier diagnosis of preterm labor and subsequently more effective tocolysis.

摘要

多项研究已证实,家庭子宫活动监测加围产期护理支持在预防高危患者早产方面具有价值。其他一些指南不太严格且护理接触不太密集的报告,对家庭子宫活动监测和围产期护理支持对早产预防计划的贡献提出了质疑。在这项大型、前瞻性、随机多中心研究中,患者被分配接受每日监测和护理接触,或接受包括强化教育和更频繁产前检查的早产预防计划。在接受监测的患者中,早产(宫颈扩张2厘米或以下)的早期检测、成功的宫缩抑制以及妊娠延长至足月均有显著增加。这些早产诊断中有31%是在子宫活动增加但患者无相关自觉症状的情况下评估得出的。我们得出结论,每日子宫活动监测和围产期护理支持计划可导致早产的早期诊断,进而实现更有效的宫缩抑制。

相似文献

1
Home uterine activity monitoring is associated with a reduction in preterm birth.家庭子宫活动监测与早产率降低相关。
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):13S-18S.
2
Preventing preterm birth in twin gestation: home uterine activity monitoring and perinatal nursing support.预防双胎妊娠早产:家庭子宫活动监测与围产期护理支持。
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):24S-27S.
3
Management of preterm labor patients at home: does daily uterine activity monitoring and nursing support make a difference?在家中管理早产患者:每日子宫活动监测和护理支持会有不同效果吗?
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):32S-35S.
4
The contribution of symptomatology and/or uterine activity to the incidence of unscheduled visits.
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):28S-31S.
5
Uterine activity compared with symptomatology in the detection of preterm labor.在早产检测中子宫活动与症状学的比较
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):19S-23S.
6
Preterm birth: a puzzle worth solving.早产:一个值得解决的难题。
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):5S-12S.
7
Monitoring women at risk for preterm labor.监测有早产风险的女性。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 1;338(1):15-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801013380103.
8
Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of home monitoring of uterine contractions.子宫收缩家庭监测的成本效益评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):71S-75S.
9
Randomized comparison of home uterine activity monitoring and routine care in patients discharged after treatment for preterm labor.
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):319-23.
10
Uterine activity characteristics in multiple gestations.多胎妊娠中的子宫活动特征。
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1 Suppl):56S-59S.

引用本文的文献

1
Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour.用于检测早产的家庭子宫监测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD006172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006172.pub4.
2
Home uterine activity monitoring in the prevention of very low birth weight.家庭子宫活动监测预防极低出生体重儿
Public Health Rep. 1997 Sep-Oct;112(5):433-9.