Suppr超能文献

一种双重框架抽样方法,用于解决烟草控制研究中的固定电话替代问题。

A dual-frame sampling methodology to address landline replacement in tobacco control research.

机构信息

AAP Tobacco Consortium and Julius B. Richmond Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA Social Science Research Center and Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi, USA.

AAP Tobacco Consortium and Julius B. Richmond Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, USA MGH Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2015 Jan;24(1):7-10. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050727. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the comparability of self-reported smoking prevalence estimates from a dual-frame survey with those from two large-scale, national surveys.

METHODS

The Social Climate Survey of Tobacco Control (SCS-TC) obtained self-reported current smoking status via a dual-frame methodology in the fall of 2010. One frame used random digit dialling procedures and consisted of households with a landline telephone; the other frame consisted of a population-based probability-based online panel. Current smoking prevalence was compared with national estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

RESULTS

18.3% (95% CI 17.0% to 19.6%) of SCS-TC respondents reported current smoking. NHIS and NHANES estimates found 19.4% (95% CI 18.8% to 20.1%) and 20.3% (95% CI 18.7% to 22.1%), respectively, reporting current smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence estimates for cigarette smoking obtained from the dual-frame SCS-TC are comparable to those from other national surveys. A mixed-mode approach may be a useful strategy to transition cross-sectional surveys with established trend data to newer dual-frame designs to maintain compatibility with surveys from previous years and to include the growing number of households that do not have landline telephones.

摘要

目的

我们评估了双重框架调查中自我报告的吸烟流行率估计值与两项大型全国性调查的估计值之间的可比性。

方法

2010 年秋季,社会气候烟草控制调查(SCS-TC)通过双重框架方法获得自我报告的当前吸烟状况。一个框架使用随机数字拨号程序,由有固定电话的家庭组成;另一个框架由基于人口的概率在线小组组成。当前吸烟流行率与 2010 年全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)和 2009-2010 年全国健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的全国估计值进行比较。

结果

18.3%(95%置信区间 17.0%至 19.6%)的 SCS-TC 受访者报告当前吸烟。NHIS 和 NHANES 的估计值分别发现 19.4%(95%置信区间 18.8%至 20.1%)和 20.3%(95%置信区间 18.7%至 22.1%)报告当前吸烟。

结论

从双重框架 SCS-TC 获得的香烟吸烟流行率估计值与其他全国性调查的估计值相当。混合模式方法可能是一种有用的策略,可以将具有既定趋势数据的横断面调查过渡到新的双重框架设计,以保持与前几年调查的兼容性,并包括越来越多没有固定电话的家庭。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验