Suppr超能文献

阿昔替尼对比索拉非尼作为晚期肾细胞癌的二线治疗:一项随机 3 期临床试验的总生存分析及更新结果。

Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):552-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70093-7. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, patients given axitinib had a longer progression-free survival (PFS). Here, we report overall survival and updated efficacy, quality of life, and safety results.

METHODS

Eligible patients had clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma, progressive disease after one approved systemic treatment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-1. 723 patients were stratified by ECOG PS and previous treatment and randomly allocated (1:1) to receive axitinib (5 mg twice daily; n=361) or sorafenib (400 mg twice daily; n=362). The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by a masked, independent radiology review committee. We assessed patient-reported outcomes using validated questionnaires. Baseline characteristics and development of hypertension on treatment were studied as prognostic factors. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This ongoing trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00678392.

FINDINGS

Median overall survival was 20.1 months (95% CI 16.7-23.4) with axitinib and 19.2 months (17.5-22.3) with sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.969, 95% CI 0.800-1.174; one-sided p=0.3744). Median investigator-assessed PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.7-9.2) with axitinib and 5·7 months (4.7-6.5) with sorafenib (HR 0.656, 95% CI 0.552-0.779; one-sided p<0.0001). Patient-reported outcomes scores were similar in the treatment groups at baseline, were maintained during treatment, but decreased at end-of-treatment. Common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (60 [17%]), diarrhoea (40 [11%]), and fatigue (37 [10%]) in 359 axitinib-treated patients and hand-foot syndrome (61 [17%]), hypertension (43 [12%]), and diarrhoea (27 [8%]) in 355 sorafenib-treated patients. In a post-hoc 12-week landmark analysis, median overall survival was longer in patients with a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater than in those with a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg: 20.7 months (95% CI 18.4-24.6) versus 12.9 months (10.1-20.4) in the axitinib group (p=0.0116), and 20.2 months (17.1-32.0) versus 14.8 months (12.0-17.7) in the sorafenib group (one-sided p=0.0020).

INTERPRETATION

Although overall survival, a secondary endpoint for the study, did not differ between the two groups, investigator-assessed PFS remained longer in the axitinib group compared with the sorafenib group. These results establish axitinib as a second-line treatment option for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

FUNDING

Pfizer Inc.

摘要

背景

在一项比较阿昔替尼与索拉非尼作为转移性肾细胞癌二线治疗的疗效和安全性的 3 期试验中,接受阿昔替尼治疗的患者无进展生存期(PFS)更长。在此,我们报告总生存期和更新的疗效、生活质量和安全性结果。

方法

符合条件的患者为透明细胞转移性肾细胞癌,一线治疗后疾病进展,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)为 0-1。723 名患者根据 ECOG PS 和既往治疗进行分层,并按 1:1 随机分配接受阿昔替尼(5mg 每日 2 次;n=361)或索拉非尼(400mg 每日 2 次;n=362)治疗。主要终点是由盲法独立放射学审查委员会评估的 PFS。我们使用经过验证的问卷评估患者报告的结果。基线特征和治疗期间高血压的发生被作为预后因素进行研究。在意向治疗人群中评估疗效,在至少接受一剂研究药物的患者中评估安全性。这项正在进行的试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00678392。

发现

阿昔替尼组的中位总生存期为 20.1 个月(95%CI 16.7-23.4),索拉非尼组为 19.2 个月(17.5-22.3)(风险比[HR]0.969,95%CI 0.800-1.174;单侧 p=0.3744)。阿昔替尼组研究者评估的中位 PFS 为 8.3 个月(95%CI 6.7-9.2),索拉非尼组为 5·7 个月(4.7-6.5)(HR 0.656,95%CI 0.552-0.779;单侧 p<0.0001)。治疗组基线时患者报告的结局评分相似,在治疗期间保持稳定,但在治疗结束时下降。常见的 3 级或更高级别的治疗相关不良事件是高血压(60[17%])、腹泻(40[11%])和疲劳(37[10%]),在 359 例接受阿昔替尼治疗的患者中;手足综合征(61[17%])、高血压(43[12%])和腹泻(27[8%]),在 355 例接受索拉非尼治疗的患者中。在事后 12 周的关键分析中,舒张压为 90mmHg 或以上的患者中位总生存期长于舒张压小于 90mmHg 的患者:阿昔替尼组为 20.7 个月(95%CI 18.4-24.6)比 12.9 个月(10.1-20.4)(p=0.0116),索拉非尼组为 20.2 个月(17.1-32.0)比 14.8 个月(12.0-17.7)(单侧 p=0.0020)。

解释

尽管总生存期是该研究的次要终点,但两组之间没有差异,研究者评估的 PFS 仍在阿昔替尼组中保持更长。这些结果确立了阿昔替尼作为转移性肾细胞癌二线治疗的选择。

资金

辉瑞公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验