Ozay Zeynep Irem, Jo Yeonjung, Galarza Fortuna Gliceida, Hage Chehade Chadi, Gebrael Georges, Ostrowski Micah, Sayegh Nicolas, Anderson Ethan, Jaime-Casas Salvador, Zugman Miguel, Mathew Thomas Vinay, Maughan Benjamin L, Agarwal Neeraj, Pal Sumanta K, Swami Umang
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251201. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1201.
The treatment landscape of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has rapidly evolved with the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations. However, clinical data on changes in treatment patterns and attrition before and after ICI-based combinations approval are lacking.
To assess treatment patterns and attrition rates in patients with metastatic ccRCC before and after the approval of ICI-based combinations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used patient-level data from a nationwide deidentified electronic health record-derived database, originating from around 280 cancer clinics in the US. Patients diagnosed with metastatic ccRCC who received first-line therapy between January 1, 2011, and January 20, 2023, were included. Those treated for 2 or more malignant neoplasms or enrolled in clinical trials were excluded.
Line of therapy initiation before and after April 16, 2018.
Treatments received in each line of therapy and attrition rate were summarized using frequencies and percentages.
Of 12 707 patients with metastatic ccRCC within the database, 8534 were eligible and included (median [IQR] age, 66 [59-74] years; 6032 male [70.7%]; 629 Black [8.1%], 697 Hispanic [9.0%], 5493 White [71.0%]). Before April 16, 2018, the most common first-line therapy was tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy (3595 of 4561 patients [78.8%]). Following the approval of ICI-based combinations in 2018, most patients (2392 of 3973 patients [60.2%]) received ICI-based combinations as first-line therapy for metastatic ccRCC. TKI monotherapy remained the most common second- and third-line therapy in patients treated before and after April 16, 2018. Before 2018, 2639 patients (57.9%) and 1458 patients (31.9%) received second-line and third-line therapies, respectively, compared with 1494 (37.6%) and 562 (14.1%) after 2018.
In this cohort study of 8534 patients with metastatic ccRCC, although ICI-based combinations are the preferred first-line therapy due to their proven superiority over TKI monotherapy, many patients were not receiving them; high attrition rates were observed in subsequent lines. These findings highlight the need to optimize treatment selection by implementing current guidelines in clinical practice.
随着多种基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的联合方案获批,转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)的治疗格局迅速演变。然而,缺乏基于ICI的联合方案获批前后治疗模式变化和损耗情况的临床数据。
评估基于ICI的联合方案获批前后转移性ccRCC患者的治疗模式和损耗率。
设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用了来自全国范围去识别化电子健康记录衍生数据库的患者层面数据,该数据库源自美国约280家癌症诊所。纳入2011年1月1日至2023年1月20日期间接受一线治疗的转移性ccRCC患者。排除接受过2种或更多种恶性肿瘤治疗或参加临床试验的患者。
2018年4月16日前后的治疗起始线。
使用频率和百分比总结各治疗线接受的治疗和损耗率。
数据库中的12707例转移性ccRCC患者中,8534例符合条件并被纳入(中位[四分位间距]年龄,66[59 - 74]岁;6032例男性[70.7%];629例黑人[8.1%],697例西班牙裔[9.0%],5493例白人[71.0%])。2018年4月16日之前,最常见的一线治疗是酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)单药治疗(4561例患者中的3595例[78.8%])。2018年基于ICI的联合方案获批后,大多数患者(3973例患者中的2392例[60.2%])接受基于ICI的联合方案作为转移性ccRCC的一线治疗。TKI单药治疗在2018年4月16日前后接受治疗的患者中仍是最常见的二线和三线治疗。2018年之前,分别有2639例患者(57.9%)和1458例患者(31.9%)接受二线和三线治疗,而2018年之后分别为1494例(37.6%)和562例(14.1%)。
在这项对8534例转移性ccRCC患者的队列研究中,尽管基于ICI的联合方案因其已证实优于TKI单药治疗而成为首选一线治疗,但许多患者未接受此类治疗;后续治疗线中观察到高损耗率。这些发现凸显了在临床实践中实施现行指南以优化治疗选择的必要性。