Leuck Marlene, Levandovski Rosa, Harb Ana, Quiles Caroline, Hidalgo Maria Paz
Laboratório de Cronobiologia Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)/Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 Feb;38(2):263-8. doi: 10.1177/0148607113482331. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of continuous and intermittent methods of enteral nutrition (EN) administration on circadian rhythm.
Thirty-four individuals, aged between 52 and 80 years, were fed through a nasoenteric tube. Fifteen individuals received a continuous infusion for 24 hours/d, and 19 received an intermittent infusion in comparable quantities, every 4 hours from 8:00 to 20:00. In each patient, 4 indirect calorimetric measurements were carried out over 24 hours (A: 7:30, B: 10:30, C: 14:30, and D: 21:30) for 3 days.
Energy expenditure and oxygen consumption were significantly higher in the intermittent group than in the continuous group (1782 ± 862 vs 1478 ± 817 kcal/24 hours, P = .05; 257 125 vs 212 117 ml/min, P = .048, respectively). The intermittent group had higher levels of energy expenditure and oxygen consumption at all the measured time points compared with the continuous group. energy expenditure and oxygen consumption in both groups were significantly different throughout the day for 3 days.
There is circadian rhythm variation of energy expenditure and oxygen consumption with continuous and intermittent infusion for EN. This suggests that only one indirect daily calorimetric measurement is not able to show the patient's true needs. Energy expenditure is higher at night with both food administration methods. Moreover, energy expenditure and oxygen consumption are higher with the intermittent administration method at all times.
本研究旨在评估肠内营养(EN)连续和间歇给药方法对昼夜节律的影响。
34名年龄在52至80岁之间的个体通过鼻肠管进行喂养。15名个体每天连续输注24小时,19名个体在8:00至20:00每4小时接受等量的间歇输注。对每位患者在24小时内进行4次间接能量测定(A:7:30,B:10:30,C:14:30,D:21:30),共进行3天。
间歇组的能量消耗和氧气消耗显著高于连续组(分别为1782±862 vs 1478±817千卡/24小时,P = 0.05;257 125 vs 212 117毫升/分钟,P = 0.048)。与连续组相比,间歇组在所有测量时间点的能量消耗和氧气消耗水平都更高。两组的能量消耗和氧气消耗在3天内全天均有显著差异。
EN连续和间歇输注时,能量消耗和氧气消耗存在昼夜节律变化。这表明仅进行一次间接每日能量测定无法显示患者的真实需求。两种食物给药方法在夜间的能量消耗都更高。此外,间歇给药方法在所有时间的能量消耗和氧气消耗都更高。